Phytoplankton primary production is a crucial component of Arctic Ocean (AO) biogeochemistry, playing a pivotal role in the carbon cycling by supporting higher trophic levels and removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. The advent of satellite observations measuring chlorophyll a concentration (Chl_ a) has yielded unprecedented insights into the distribution of AO phytoplankton, enhancing our ability to assess oceanic productivity. However, the optical properties of AO waters differ significantly from those of lower‐latitude waters, and standard Chl_a algorithms perform poorly in the AO. In particular, Chl_a retrievals are challenged by interferences from other marine constituents including higher pigment packaging and higher proportion of light absorption by colored dissolved organic matter. To derive phytoplankton-originating signature as well as mitigate those effects, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) emerges as a valuable tool for acquiring physiological insights into the direct photosynthetic processes in the AO. In this study, we leverage satellite-based SIF measurements to assess their correlation with a set of predictive factors influencing phytoplankton photosynthesis. We extend the temporal coverage of AO SIF data to cover the period 2004 - 2020. This novel dataset offers a pathway to monitor the physiological interactions of phytoplankton with changes in climate, promising to significantly improve our understanding of the Arctic water’s productivity. The application of this data is expected to provide insights into how phytoplankton respond to shifts in environmental changes, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of their role in High-Latitude Northern Oceans ecosystems.

Solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) shows enormous promise as a proxy for photosynthesis and as a tool for modeling variability in gross primary productivity (GPP) and net biosphere exchange (NBE). In this study, we explore the skill of SIF and other vegetation indicators in predicting variability in global atmospheric CO2 observations, and thus global variability in NBE. We do so using a four-year record of global CO2 observations from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite and using a geostatistical inverse model. We find that existing SIF products closely correlate with space-time variability in atmospheric CO2 observations in the extra-tropics but show weaker explanatory power across the tropics. In the extra-tropics, all SIF products exhibit greater skill in explaining variability in atmospheric CO2 observations compared to an ensemble of process-based CO2 flux models and other vegetation indicators. Furthermore, we find that using SIF as a predictor variable in the geosatistical inverse model shifts the seasonal cycle of estimated NBE and yields an earlier end to the growing season relative to other vegetation indicators. In tropical biomes, by contrast, the seasonal cycles of SIF products and estimated NBE are out of phase, and existing respiration and biomass burning estimates do not reconcile this discrepancy. Overall, our results highlight several advantages and challenges of using SIF products to help predict global variability in GPP and NBE.