Factors influencing data reproducibility of fission-track (FT) thermochronology can be summarized into three main categories associated with data acquisition steps. (1) Sample preparation involves mineral separation, mounting, polishing and etching; (2) data revelation relates to instrumentation (microscope, LAICPMS, etc.) and software settings; and (3) execution depends on feature selection by the analyst. Previous committee reports and studies (Hurford A.J. 1990; Ketcham et al. 2009; Ketcham et al. 2015; Ketcham et al. 2018) have contributed significant insights into the reproducibility of fission-track data by comparing length and age measurements produced by several laboratories using their own preparation and revelation procedures. A recent attempt to isolate analyst-specific factors in length measurement using an image-based approach (Tamer et al. 2019) found that when two analysts observe the same feature and agree it is a valid track, measurement reproducibility was very good, though impacted by etching. Dispersion of individual length measurements was 0.7-1.0 µm (2 for weaker etching and 0.5-0.8 µm for stronger etching, but mean lengths were always within 0.1 µm of each other. Where the analysts disagreed more significantly, however, was in finding tracks and evaluating whether they were valid, sufficiently clear, and sufficiently etched for measurement, which led to differences of up to ~0.8 µm in mean track length. This study builds on the image-based approach to encompass more aspects of the measurement process and increase the number of analysts being compared. We will look at confined track selection in greater detail, and also study analyst decisions behind age determination, including the selection of the region of interest for counting, and identification of grain-surface features as tracks appropriate for counting. Reflected and transmitted light image stacks for 41 grains and graticules are available on a cloud platform Participants will carry out analyses of these images using their preferred approach, e.g. suitable analytical software, manual measurements or AI-based analysis. A limited license for FastTracks (v3.2) will be available for those who would like to participate but do not have measurement software. Analysts are asked to fill out a questionnaire about their fission track experience, conduct track density estimations, confined track length and Dpar measurements, and especially provide comments on all grains being analyzed or skipped. FastTracks users are asked to send the .xml files produced by the software, while other participants are asked to submit the results using a template. The results will be entirely anonymous unless the analyst states otherwise. The deadline for the submission of the results is June 1st, 2022. The results will be shared on 18th International Conference on Thermochronology.

Monazite fission-track presents itself as a novel, low-temperature thermochronometer with annealing studies placing its closure temperature between ~45 and 25 °C. Previously, monazite has been unsuitable for fission-track dating due to high abundance of gadolinium and insufficient investigation of the etching protocol. Gadolinium causes self-shielding via thermal neutron capture and substantial associated nuclear heating during irradiation which prevented robust monazite fission-track dating using the traditional external detector method. Further, early etching studies were found to be extremely corrosive to monazite grains. However, developments in LA-ICP-MS fission-track analysis allow for measurement of 238U and improvements in monazite fission-track etching protocols mean that dating monazite through the fission-track method is now viable. In this study, we present monazite fission-track data from an elevation profile (2260 m, 2000 m, 1600 m, and 1200 m) from the Catalina metamorphic core complex (Catalina MCC), in southern AZ, USA. We follow the etching protocol described in Jones et al. (2019), etching the monazites in 6 M HCl for 90 minutes at 90 °C. We measure the 238U concentration via LA-ICP-MS and compare the dates to other multi-method thermochronology from the same rocks. Traditional low-temperature thermochronology (apatite and zircon fission-track, apatite and zircon (U-Th-Sm)/He) from the Catalina MCC reveals cooling at 25-20 Ma and 18-10 Ma. Preliminary monazite fission-track analysis yields a date of 6.1 ± 0.4 Ma, far younger than all the traditional thermochronometric data, in-line its far lower closure temperature. The 6 Ma monazite fission-track date is consistent with the youngest phase of hematite (U-Th)/He dates observed in the nearby Rincon metamorphic core complex and suggest that these dates correspond to the latest phase of exhumation in response to Basin and Range extension and/or climate enhanced erosion. These preliminary results show that monazite fission-track can reveal shallow crustal processes and contribute to constraining thermal histories below ~60 oC, which are traditionally difficult to resolve.