Objective: To compare the carbon footprint of caesarean and vaginal birth. Design: Life cycle assessment. Setting: Tertiary maternity units and home births in the UK and the Netherlands Methods: A life cycle assessment, including: equipment use, energy, analgesia, hospital stay, waste, sterilisation and laundry, was conducted using primary data combined with data from published sources. Main Outcome Measures: ‘Carbon footprint’ (in kgCO 2e) Results: Excluding analgesia, the carbon footprint of a caesarean birth in the UK was 31.21 kgCO 2e, compared with 12.47 kgCO 2e for vaginal birth in hospital and 7.63 kgCO 2e at home. In the Netherlands the carbon footprint of a caesarean was higher (32.96 kgCO 2e), but lower for vaginal birth in hospital and home (10.74 and 6.27 kgCO 2e respectively). Emissions associated with analgesia for vaginal birth were: 0.08 kgCO 2e (opioid analgesia), 0.75 kgCO 2e (remifentanil), 1.2 kgCO 2e (epidural) and 237.33 kgCO 2e (nitrous oxide with oxygen). Differences in analgesia use resulted in a lower average carbon footprint for vaginal birth in the Netherlands than the UK (11.64 vs. 193.26 kgCO 2e). Conclusion: The carbon footprint of a caesarean is higher than for vaginal birth if analgesia is excluded, but this is very sensitive to the analgesia used; use of nitrous oxide with oxygen multiplies the carbon footprint of vaginal birth 25-fold. Alternative methods of pain relief or nitrous oxide destruction systems would lead to a substantial improvement in carbon footprint. Although clinical need and maternal choice are paramount, protocols should consider the environmental impact of different choices.

Objectives To investigate the risk of stillbirth in relation to; 1) a previous CD compared to those following a vaginal birth (VB); and 2) vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) compared to a repeat CD. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting The Swedish Medical Birth registry Population Women with their first and second singletons between 1982 and 2012. Methods Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the association between CD in the first pregnancy and stillbirth in the second pregnancy and the association between VBAC and stillbirth. Sub-group analyses were performed by types of CD and timing of stillbirth (antepartum and intrapartum). Main outcome measures Stillbirth (antepartum and intrapartum fetal death). Results Of the 1,771,700 singleton births from 885,850 women,117,114 (13.2%) women had a CD in the first pregnancy, and 51,755 had VBAC in the second pregnancy. We found a 37% increased odds of stillbirth (aOR:1.37 [95% CI, 1.23–1.52]) in women with a previous CD compared to VB. The odds of intrapartum stillbirth was higher in previous pre-labour CD group (aOR:2.72 [95% CI, 1.51–4.91]) than the previous in-labour CD group (aOR:1.35 [95% CI, 0.76–2.40,]), although not statistically significant in the latter case. No increased odds was found for intrapartum stillbirth in women who had VBAC (aOR:0.99 [95% CI, 0.48–2.06]) compared to women who had a repeat CD, whereas women with antepartum stillbirth were more likely to have a VBAC (aOR:4.49 [95% CI, 3.55–5.67]). Conclusions This study confirms that a CD is associated with an increased risk of subsequent stillbirth, with a greater risk among pre-labour CD. This association is not solely mediated by increases in intrapartum asphyxia, uterine rupture or attempted VBAC. Further research is needed to understand this association, but these findings might help health care providers to reach optimal decisions regarding mode of birth, particularly when CD is unnecessary.

Background A core outcome set could address inconsistent outcome reporting and improve evidence for stillbirth care research, which has been identified as an important research priority. Objectives To identify outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported by studies evaluating interventions after the diagnosis of a stillbirth. Search strategy Amed, BNI, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP from 1998 to August 2021. Selection criteria Randomised and non-randomised comparative or non-comparative studies reporting a stillbirth care intervention. Data collection and analysis Interventions, outcomes reported, definitions and outcome measurement tools were extracted. Main results 40 randomised and 200 non-randomised studies were included. 58 different interventions were reported, labour and birth care (52 studies), hospital bereavement care (28 studies), clinical investigations (116 studies), care in a multiple pregnancy (2 studies), psychosocial support (28 studies) and care in a subsequent pregnancy (14 studies). 391 unique outcomes were reported and organised into 14 outcome domains: labour and birth; postpartum; delivery of care; investigations; multiple pregnancy; mental health; emotional functioning; grief and bereavement; social functioning; relationship; whole person; subsequent pregnancy; subsequent children and siblings and economic. 242 outcome measurement instruments were used, with 0-22 tools per outcome. Conclusions Heterogeneity in outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement tools in care after stillbirth exists. Considerable research gaps on specific intervention types in stillbirth care were identified. A core outcome set is needed to standardise outcome collection and reporting for stillbirth care research.