Zubair Akhtar

and 13 more

Background: Recent evidences reported that co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza virus is common. We explored hospital-based influenza surveillance (HBIS) data during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We analyzed data from March to December 2020 among patients admitted with severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) defined as subjective or measured fever of ≥ 38 C° and cough with onset within the last ten days. Physicians recorded patients’ demographic, clinical, and laboratory information and obtained nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs to test for influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR. Results: We enrolled 1,986 SARI case-patients with median age of 28 years (IQR: 1.2 ­ 53 years), and 67.6% were male. Among SARI case-patients, 285 (14.3%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and 175 (8.8%) infected with influenza virus. Only five (0.3%) SARI patients were co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus. Difficulty breathing (83% vs. 77%, p=0.024) and sore throat (26% vs. 17%, p<0.001) were more likely to be present in SARS-CoV-2-infected SARI patients. SARI case-patients with diabetes and hypertension were more likely (14% vs. 6%, p<0.001 and 27% vs. 12%, p<0.001 respectively) to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus than those without co-morbidities. Influenza virus remained undetectable during the first 14 weeks of the 20 weeks (May to September) of peak influenzacirculation period in Bangladesh. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus was not very common together with nonappearance of the influenza virus during most of the peak influenza period in Bangladesh during COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are warranted for further exploration.

Ariful Islam

and 17 more

Background We explored whether hospital-based surveillance is useful in detecting severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) clusters and how often these events result in outbreak investigation and community mitigation. Methods During May 2009– December 2020, physicians at 14 sentinel hospitals prospectively identified SARI clusters (i.e., ≥2 SARI cases who developed symptoms ≤10 days of each other and lived <30 minute walk or <3 km from each other). Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for influenza and other respiratory viruses by rRT-PCR. We describe the demographic of persons within clusters, laboratory results, and outbreak investigations. Results Physicians identified 464 clusters comprising 1,427 SARI cases (range 0–13 clusters per month). Sixty percent of clusters had three, 23% had 2, and 17% had ≥4 cases. Their median age was 2 years (interquartile [IQR] 0.4–25) and 63% were male. Laboratory results were available for the 464 clusters a median 9 days (IQR = 6–13 days) after cluster identification. Less than one in five clusters had cases that tested positive for the same virus: RSV in 58 (13%), influenza viruses in 24 (5%), HMPV in 5 (1%), HPIV in 3 (0.6%), adenovirus in 2 (0.4%). While 102/464 (22%) had poultry exposure, none tested positive for influenza A(H5N1) or A(H7N9). None of the 464 clusters led to field deployments for outbreak response. Conclusions For 11 years, none of the hundreds of identified clusters led to emergency response. The value of this event-based surveillance might be improved by seeking larger clusters, with stronger epidemiologic ties or decedents.

Ariful Islam

and 6 more

The exact origin of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and source of introduction into humans has not been established yet, though it might be originated from animals. Therefore, we conducted a literature review to understand the putative reservoirs, transmission dynamics, and susceptibility patterns of SARS-CoV-2 in animals. Rhinolophu s bats are presumed to be natural progenitors of SARS-CoV-2 related viruses. Initially pangolin was thought to be the source of spillover to human, but they might get infected from human or other animal species. So, the virus spillover pathways to humans remain unknown. Human-to-animal transmission has been testified in pet, farmed, zoo and free-ranging wild animals. Infected animals can transmit the virus to other animals in natural settings like, mink-to-mink, and mink-to-cat transmission. Animal-to-human transmission is not a persistent pathway, while mink-to-human transmission continues to be illuminated. Multiple companion and captive wild animals were infected by emerging alpha variant of concern (B.1.1.7 lineage) whereas Asiatic lions were infected by delta variant, (B.1.617.2). To date, multiple animal species- cat, ferrets, non-human primates, hamsters, and bats, showed high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in experimental condition, while swine, poultry, cattle showed no susceptibility. The founding of SARS-CoV-2 in wild animal reservoirs can confronts the control of the virus in humans and might carry a risk to the welfare and conservation of wildlife as well. We suggest vaccinating pet, and captive animals to stop spillover and spillback events. We recommend sustainable one health surveillance at animal-human-environmental interface to detect and prevent future epidemics and pandemics by Disease X.