Background: Previous studies suggest that wide area circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (WACA) is more effective than segmental pulmonary vein ablation (SPVA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Whether this is true in patients (pts) with very short duration paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is unknown. Objective: To compare WACA to SPVA in pts with PAF lasting <48 hours. Methods: One hundred pts with PAF <48 hours were randomized to either WACA vs SPVA (45 and 53 pts respectively, with 2 withdrawals), and followed up for 24 months with 14-day ECGs every 6 months. Results: Among 97 pts at an average of 22.1±4.8 months followup, 26 (57.8%) remained free of any atrial arrhythmias after WACA versus 29 (55.86%) after SPVA (p=0.64). Sixteen pts (35.6%) had recurrent PAF after WACA versus 20 pts (38.5%) after SPVA (p=0.79). Seven pts (15.6%) had atrial flutter after WACA versus 5 pts (9.64%) after SPVA (p=0.376) and 1 pt (2.2%) had atrial tachycardia after WACA vs 1 pt (1.9%) after SPVA (p=0.918). Total procedure time was lower for SPVA vs WACA (242.9 vs 271.1 minutes, p= 0.047), and fluoroscopy time similar for WACA vs SPVA (50.8 vs 53.4 minutes, p=0.555). Conclusions: As an initial ablation approach in pts with PAF <48 hours, SPVA was similarly effective to WACA with respect to arrhythmia recurrence, supporting the central role of the pulmonary veins for maintaining AF in these pts. Future therapies using alternative ablation energies may incorporate these insights to reduce risk to gastroesophageal structures.

A document by Gregory Feld. Click on the document to view its contents.

Objective: To determine trends in real-world utilization and in-hospital adverse events from Watchman implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015. Background: The risk of embolic stroke caused by atrial fibrillation is reduced by oral anticoagulants, but not all patients can tolerate long-term anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Watchman device has emerged as an alternative therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015-2017. The outcomes assessed in this study were associated complications, in-hospital mortality, and resource utilization trends after Watchman implantation. Trends analysis were performed using analysis of variance. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of mortality. Results: A total of 17,700 patients underwent Watchman implantation during the study period. There was a significantly increased trend in the number of Watchman procedures performed over the study years (from 1,195 in 2015 to 11,165 devices in 2017, p < 0.01). A significant decline in the rate of complications (from 26.4% in 2015 to 7.9% in 2017, p < 0.01) and inpatient mortality (from 1.3% in 2015 to 0.1% in 2017, p < 0.01) were noted. Predictors of in-hospital mortality included a higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (OR 2.61 per 1-point increase, 95% CI 1.91-3.57), chronic blood loss anemia (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.37-9.61) and coagulopathy (OR 4.90, 95% CI 2.32-10.35). Conclusion: In contemporary United States clinical practice, Watchman utilization has increased significantly since approval in 2015, while complications and in-patient mortality have declined.