Adeniyi Aderoba

and 6 more

Objective To investigate perinatal mortality, morbidity and obstetric intervention after introducing universal third-trimester ultrasound scan for growth restriction. Design Prospective cohort study Setting Oxfordshire (OUH), UK Population Women with a non-anomalous singleton pregnancy undergoing pregnancy care and term delivery at OUH with an estimated-date-of-birth between 01/Jan/2014 and 30/Sept/2019. Methods Universal ultrasound for fetal growth restriction between 35+0 and 36+6 weeks was introduced in 2016. The outcomes of the next 18631 eligible term pregnancies were compared, using logistic regression, with the previous 18636 who had clinically-indicated ultrasounds only. ‘Screen positives’ for growth restriction were managed according to a pre-determined protocol. Main Outcome Measures Extended perinatal mortality, a composite of mortality or encephalopathy Grade II-III, and expedited birth. Other outcomes included composite adverse outcomes used elsewhere, detection of birthweight (<10th centile) and birth <39+0 weeks. Results Extended perinatal deaths decreased from 1.7/1000 to 1.2/1000 births (aOR: 0.73; 0.43 -1.25); mortality or severe morbidity decreased from 2.9/1000 to 1.9/1000 births (OR: 0.67; 0.44-1.03). Expedited births increased from 35.2% to 37.7% (OR: 1.08; 1.04 – 1.14). Birth prior to 39+0 weeks fell 10.5% (OR 0.89: 0.85 – 0.94). Birthweight (<10th centile) detection using fetal biometry alone was 31.4%, and rose to 40.5% if all abnormal scan parameters were used. Conclusion Introducing a universal ultrasound for growth restriction has limited impact on mortality and severe morbidity, but only small increases in intervention, and less early-term birth, are possible. The detection of birthweight (<10th c) improved where markers of growth restriction are used.

Manisha Nair

and 27 more

Objective: To describe the processes used to establish and standardise a UK-India collaborative platform for maternal and perinatal health research (MaatHRI). Design: Hospital-based research platform. Setting: India Population: Pregnant women Methods: MaatHRI is adapted from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) and built on a pilot model (IndOSS-Assam), which has been extensively standardised using the following methods: (i) establishing a network of hospitals; (ii) setting up a secure system for data collection, storage and transfer; (iii) developing a standardised laboratory infrastructure; and (iv) developing and implementing regulatory systems. Results: MaatHRI was established in September 2018. Fourteen hospitals participate across four states in India – Assam, Meghalaya, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra. The Indian research team includes 20 nurses, a project manager, 16 obstetricians, two pathologists, a public health specialist, a general physician and a paediatrician. The UK partners include clinicians and epidemiologists from the University of Oxford. MaatHRI has advanced standardisation of data and laboratory parameters, monitoring data and participant safety, and secure transfer of data. An integral component of MaatHRI is bi-directional capacity building. It is overseen by a steering committee and a data safety and monitoring board which ensure equitable partnerships between the collaborating institutions. Conclusion: MaatHRI is the first prototype of UKOSS and other similar platforms in a low and middle income country (LMIC). The model used to develop the platform can be replicated in other LMICs. Funding: Medical Research Council Career Development Award to Manisha Nair (Ref:MR/P022030/1).