loading page

Improving cefazolin exposure in critically ill children using population pharmacokinetic model
  • +11
  • Clémence Rivaud,
  • Mehdi Oualha,
  • elodie salvador,
  • Emmanuelle Bille,
  • Delphine Callot,
  • agathe beranger,
  • Léo Froelicher,
  • Steeve Rouillon,
  • Julie Toubiana,
  • Sihem Benaboud,
  • Sylvain Renolleau,
  • Jean-Marc Tréluyer,
  • Déborah Hirt,
  • Noémie De Cacqueray
Clémence Rivaud
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
Mehdi Oualha
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
elodie salvador
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
Emmanuelle Bille
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
Delphine Callot
Hospital Cochin
Author Profile
agathe beranger
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
Léo Froelicher
Hospital Cochin
Author Profile
Steeve Rouillon
Hospital Cochin
Author Profile
Julie Toubiana
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
Sihem Benaboud
Hospital Cochin
Author Profile
Sylvain Renolleau
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals
Author Profile
Jean-Marc Tréluyer
Hospital Cochin
Author Profile
Déborah Hirt
Hospital Cochin
Author Profile
Noémie De Cacqueray
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Aim: Population pharmacokinetics (PK) models may be effective to improve antibiotic exposure with individualized dosing. The aim of the study is to assess cefazolin exposure using a population PK model in critically ill children. Methods: We conducted a single center observational study including children under 18 years old who had cefazolin plasma monitoring before and after the model implementation. First concentration at steady state of each cefazolin course was analyzed. Optimal exposure was defined by concentrations values ranged from free concentration over 4 times the MIC for 100% of the dosing interval to total trough or plateau concentration under 100 mg/L. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included, of whom 39 and 19 children received conventional dosing or model-informed dosing, respectively. Median [range] age was 2.3 [0.1-17] years old and median weight was 14.2 [2.9-72] kg. There were more continuous infusions (CI) in the model group than in the conventional group (n=19/19 (100%) vs n=23/39 (59%)). Compared to conventional dosing, model-informed dosing provided more optimal exposure (n=17/39 (44%) vs n= 15/19 (79%), p=0.01) and less underexposure (n= 18/39 (46%) vs n= 2/19 (10%), p=0.008), without increasing overexposure (n= 4/39 (10%) vs n= 2/19 (11%), p=1). Moreover, the time to reach a 50% decrease of C Reactive Protein levels was significantly shorter in the model group than the conventional group (3 [0.5-13] vs 4 [1-34]; p=0.045. Conclusions: Use of individualized cefazolin model-informed dosing improves critically ill children’s exposure. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical benefit of cefazolin PK model application.