James Shirley

and 7 more

Why do some Martian dust storms, in some Mars years, expand to reach planet-encircling status, while the majority do not? In what ways do the largest regional events differ from those that become global? Comparisons of observations from these two categories of events may help answer these questions. The dust storm season of 2018, which included a global-scale dust event, was preceded by five successive dust storm seasons in which only regional-scale events were observed. The recent record thus presents an opportunity for making quantitative comparisons between regional-scale and global-scale dust events. Observations by the Mars Climate Sounder, on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft, provide unique 4D information on temperatures and aerosol loading of the Mars atmosphere, to altitudes of >80 km. Available MCS observations span the past eight Mars years. We have previously employed MCS observations to characterize the evolution in latitude, longitude, and altitude of atmospheric dust clouds during the initiation phase of the 2018 global event. Other atmospheric fields provide complementary information. For instance, observed changes with time in atmospheric ‘dynamical heating’ also help characterize the response of the Mars atmosphere to added dust loading. In this process, the atmosphere in regions far removed from the locations where dust is lifted may be warmed by adiabatic compression within the descending branches of Hadley-like meridional circulation cells. We will present and interpret MCS observations of these and other phenomena for selected large regional-scale dust events of Mars Years 29-33 (from 2009 through 2017), and draw comparisons with observations obtained during the 2018 global event. We will additionally explore the implications of the results within the context of current hypotheses for the triggering of the largest dust storms on sub-seasonal time scales.

Yangcheng Luo

and 4 more

A variety of measurements of methane in the Martian atmosphere have been made over the past 15 years, showing wildly varying indications of methane abundance, location and lifetime in the Martian atmosphere. Attempts have been made to use numerical tools such as general circulation models (GCMs) to identify source locations and timing of methane releases, but these remain inconclusive under the current approach of forward-trajectory plume modeling. Here we present results using a novel, complementary method of localizing methane surface sources by modeling passive tracer trajectories backwards in time from the locations where observations of atmospheric methane have been made. Such back-trajectory modeling employs both GCM modeled winds and a Lagrangian particle dispersion model to isolate potential upwind sources of the observed signals. This approach avoids many of the pitfalls inherent in forward-trajectory modeling approaches such as numerical diffusion and subgrid-scale motion which cannot be captured in the Eulerian framework of a GCM. We have chosen to focus on localization of the detection of methane by the Planetary Fourier Spectrometer near Gale crater around Ls=336° in MY 31. This observation is consistent with a near-coincident enhanced methane ‘spike’ observed by the Mars Science Laboratory TLS instrument. We have chosen to use the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) particle dispersion model in conjunction with the Mars Weather Research and Forecasting (MarsWRF) GCM for our back-trajectory modeling. To date, we have combined MarsWRF output with a more basic trajectory model, which advects particles based on bulk winds, and have found areas of enhanced tracer density to the north of Gale crater at prior times. Incorporation of turbulent processes in the planetary boundary layer will subject these preliminary results into test. And geological context will also be used to constrain the likelihood of these methane source locations.