Xiangning Chu

and 8 more

The substorm current wedge (SCW) is believed to be driven by pressure gradients and vortices associated with fast flows. Therefore, it is expected that relevant observations are organized by the SCW’s central meridian, which cannot be determined using in-situ observations. This study takes advantage of the SCW inversion technique, which provides essential information about an SCW (e.g., location and strengths of field-aligned currents (FACs) and investigates the generation mechanisms of the SCW. First, we have found good temporal and spatial correlations between earthward flows and substorm onsets identified using the midlatitude positive bay (MPB) index. Over half of the flows are observed within 10 minutes of substorm onsets. Most flows (85%) were located inside the SCW between its upward and downward FACs. Second, superposed epoch analysis (SPEA) shows that the onset-associated flow velocity has a flow-scale (3-min) peak, while the equatorial thermal pressure has a substorm-scale (>30 min) enhancement and a trend similar to the westward electrojet and FACs in the SCW. Third, the pressure gradient calculated using in-situ observations is well organized in the SCW frame and points toward the SCW’s central meridian. These facts suggest that the SCW is likely sustained by substorm-scale pressure gradient rather than flow-scale flow vortices. The nonalignment between the pressure gradient and flux tube volume could generate an SCW with a quadrupole FAC pattern, similar to that seen in global MHD and RCM-E simulations. Their magnetic effects on the ground and geosynchronous orbit resemble a classic one-loop SCW.

Ennio Sanchez

and 7 more

Quantification of energetic electron precipitation caused by wave-particle interactions is fundamentally important to understand the cycle of particle energization and loss of the radiation belts. One important way to determine how well the wave-particle interaction models predict losses through pitch-angle scattering into the atmospheric loss cone is the direct comparison between the ionization altitude profiles expected in the atmosphere due to the precipitating fluxes and the ionization profiles actually measured with incoherent scatter radars. This paper reports such a comparison using a forward propagation of loss-cone electron fluxes, calculated with the electron pitch angle diffusion model applied to Van Allen Probes measurements, coupled with the Boulder Electron Radiation to Ionization (BERI) model, which propagates the fluxes into the atmosphere. The density profiles measured with the Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar operating in modes especially designed to optimize measurements in the D-region, show multiple instances of quantitative agreement with predicted density profiles from precipitation of electrons caused by wave-particle interactions in the inner magnetosphere. There are two several-minute long intervals of close prediction-observation approximation in the 65-93 km altitude range. These results indicate that the whistler wave-electron interactions models are realistic and produce precipitation fluxes of electrons with energies between 10 keV to >100 keV that are consistent with observations.