loading page

The future of ocean governance
  • +18
  • Bianca Haas,
  • Mary Mackay,
  • Camilla Novaglio,
  • Liam Fullbrook,
  • Michael Murunga,
  • Carla Sbrocchi,
  • Jan Mcdonald,
  • Phillipa C Mccormack,
  • Karen Alexander,
  • Maree Fudge,
  • Lyn Goldsworthy,
  • Fabio Boschetti,
  • Ian Dutton,
  • Leo Dutra,
  • Jeffrey Mcgee,
  • Yannick Rousseau,
  • Erica Spain,
  • Robert Stephenson,
  • Joanna Vince,
  • Chris Wilcox,
  • Marcus Haward
Bianca Haas
Future Seas

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Mary Mackay
CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Camilla Novaglio
CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Liam Fullbrook
School of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Michael Murunga
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Carla Sbrocchi
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Jan Mcdonald
Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Phillipa C Mccormack
Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Karen Alexander
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Maree Fudge
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Lyn Goldsworthy
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Fabio Boschetti
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Crawley, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Ian Dutton
Department of Primary Industries, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Leo Dutra
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Jeffrey Mcgee
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Yannick Rousseau
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Erica Spain
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
Robert Stephenson
Fisheries and Oceans, University of New Brunswick, St. Andrews Biological Station, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Joanna Vince
School of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Chris Wilcox
CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania
Marcus Haward
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania

Abstract

Ocean governance is complex and influenced by multiple drivers and actors with different worldviews and goals. While governance encompasses many elements, in this paper we focus on the processes that operate within and between states, civil society and local communities, and the market, including industry. Specifically, in this paper, we address the question of how to move towards more sustainable ocean governance aligning with the sustainable development goals and the UN Ocean Decade. We address three major risks to oceans that arise from governance-related issues: 1) the impacts of the overexploitation of marine resources; 2) inequitable distribution of access to and benefits from marine ecosystem services, and 3) inadequate or inappropriate adaptation to changing ocean conditions. The SDGs have been used as an underlying framework to develop these risks. We identify five drivers that may determine how ocean governance evolves, namely formal rules and institutions, evidence and knowledge-based decision-making, legitimacy of decision-making institutions, stakeholder engagement and participation, and empowering communities. These drivers were used to define two alternative futures by 2030: (a) ‘Business as Usual’ - a continuation of current trajectories and (b) ‘More Sustainable Future’ – optimistic, transformational, but technically achievable. We then identify what actions, as structured processes, can reduce the three major governance-related risks and lead to the More Sustainable Future. These actions relate to the process of co-creation and implementation of improved, comprehensive, and integrated management plans, enhancement of decision-making processes, and better anticipation and consideration of ambiguity and uncertainty.
Mar 2022Published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries volume 32 issue 1 on pages 253-270. 10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x