REFERENCES
1. Key Statistics for Neuroblastoma | Neuroblastoma Stats.
Accessed April 3, 2022.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/neuroblastoma/about/key-statistics.html
2. Brodeur GM. Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma. Cell
Tissue Res . 2018;372(2):277-286. doi:10.1007/s00441-017-2761-2
3. Hero B, Simon T, Spitz R, et al. Localized infant neuroblastomas
often show spontaneous regression: Results of the prospective trials
NB95-S and NB97. Journal of Clinical Oncology .
2008;26(9):1504-1510. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3349
4. Cozzi DA, Mele E, Ceccanti S, et al. Long-term Follow-up of the
“Wait and See” Approach to Localized Perinatal Adrenal Neuroblastoma.World Journal of Surgery 2012 37:2 . 2012;37(2):459-465.
doi:10.1007/S00268-012-1837-0
5. Fritsch P, Kerbl R, Lackner H, Urban C. “Wait and see” strategy in
localized neuroblastoma in infants: An option not only for cases
detected by mass screening. Pediatric Blood and Cancer .
2004;43(6):679-682. doi:10.1002/pbc.20126
6. Nishihira H, Toyoda Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Natural Course of
Neuroblastoma Detected by Mass Screening: A 5-Year Prospective Study at
a Single Institution. JCO . 2000;18(16):3012-3017.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2000.18.16.3012
7. Nuchtern JG, London WB, Barnewolt CE, et al. A prospective study of
expectant observation as primary therapy for neuroblastoma in young
infants: A children’s oncology group study. Annals of Surgery .
2012;256(4):573-580. doi:10.1097/SLA.0B013E31826CBBBD
8. Okazaki T, Kohno S, Mimaya JI, et al. Neuroblastoma detected by mass
screening: the Tumor Board’s role in its treatment. Pediatric
Surgery International 2004 20:1 . 2003;20(1):27-32.
doi:10.1007/S00383-003-1070-X
9. Tanaka M, Kigasawa H, Kato K, et al. A prospective study of a
long-term follow-up of an observation program for neuroblastoma detected
by mass screening. Pediatric Blood & Cancer . 2010;54(4):573-578.
doi:10.1002/PBC.22400
10. Yoneda A, Oue T, Imura K, et al. Observation of Untreated Patients
With Neuroblastoma Detected by Mass Screening: A “Wait and See” Pilot
Study. Med Pediatr Oncol . 2001;36:160-162. doi:10.1002/1096-911X
11. Oue T, Inoue M, Yoneda A, et al. Profile of neuroblastoma detected
by mass screening, resected after observation without treatment: results
of the Wait and See pilot study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery .
2005;40(2):359-363. doi:10.1016/J.JPEDSURG.2004.10.062
12. Yamamoto K, Hanada R, Kikuchi A, et al. Spontaneous regression of
localized neuroblastoma detected by mass screening. JCO .
1998;16(4):1265-1269. doi:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1265
13. Bagatell R, McHugh K, Naranjo A, et al. Assessment of Primary Site
Response in Children With High-Risk Neuroblastoma: An International
Multicenter Study. JCO . 2016;34(7):740-746.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2042
14. Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, et al. The International
Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force
Report. JCO . 2009;27(2):298-303. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6876
15. Anderson S: J, Elliott M, Gaze M, et al. CHILDREN’S CANCER AND
LEUKAEMIA GROUP (CCLG) NEUROBLASTOMA SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP Low and
Intermediate Risk Neuroblastoma Treatment Guidelines On Behalf of CCLG
Neuroblastoma .; 2020.
16. Rubie H, De Bernardi B, Gerrard M, et al. Excellent Outcome With
Reduced Treatment in Infants With Nonmetastatic and Unresectable
Neuroblastoma Without MYCN Amplification: Results of the
Prospective INES 99.1. JCO . 2011;29(4):449-455.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5196
17. Children’s Oncology Group. Utilizing Response- and
Biology-Based Risk Factors to Guide Therapy in Patients With
Non-High-Risk Neuroblastoma . clinicaltrials.gov; 2022. Accessed May 24,
2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02176967
18. Schleiermacher G, Mosseri V, London WB, et al. Segmental chromosomal
alterations have prognostic impact in neuroblastoma: a report from the
INRG project. Br J Cancer . 2012;107(8):1418-1422.
doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.375
19. Twist CJ, Naranjo A, Schmidt ML, et al. Defining Risk Factors for
Chemotherapeutic Intervention in Infants With Stage 4S Neuroblastoma: A
Report From Children’s Oncology Group Study ANBL0531. JCO .
2019;37(2):115-124. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.00419