REFERENCES
Ackerley, R., 2014a. Touch perceptions across skin sites: differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00054
Ackerley, R., 2014b. Human C-tactile afferents are tuned to the temperature of a skin-stroking caress. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 34, 2879–2883. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2847-13.2014
Ali, S.H., Makdani, A.D., Cordero, M.I., Paltoglou, A.E., Marshall, A.G., McFarquhar, M.J., McGlone, F.P., Walker, S.C., Trotter, P.D., 2023. Hold me or stroke me? Individual differences in static and dynamic affective touch. PLOS ONE 18, e0281253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281253
Basile, B.M., Joiner, J.A., Dal Monte, O., Fagan, N.A., Karaskiewicz, C.L., Lucas, D.R., Chang, S.W.C., Murray, E.A., 2021. Autonomic arousal tracks outcome salience not valence in monkeys making social decisions. Behav. Neurosci. 135, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000424
Beatty, J., 1982. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol. Bull. 91, 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276
Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y., 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 57, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bertheaux, C., Toscano, R., Fortunier, R., Roux, J.-C., Charier, D., Borg, C., 2020. Emotion Measurements Through the Touch of Materials Surfaces. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13.
Björnsdotter, M., Löken, L., Olausson, H., Vallbo, A., Wessberg, J., 2009. Somatotopic organization of gentle touch processing in the posterior insular cortex. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 29, 9314–9320. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0400-09.2009
Bytomski, A., Ritschel, G., Bierling, A., Bendas, J., Weidner, K., Croy, I., 2020. Maternal stroking is a fine-tuned mechanism relating to C-tactile afferent activation: An exploratory study. Psychol. Neurosci. 13, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000184
Cascio, C.J., Moore, D., McGlone, F., 2019. Social touch and human development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., Social Touch: A new vista for developmental cognitive neuroscience? 35, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009
Case, L.K., Liljencrantz, J., McCall, M.V., Bradson, M., Necaise, A., Tubbs, J., Olausson, H., Wang, B., Bushnell, M.C., 2021. Pleasant Deep Pressure: Expanding the Social Touch Hypothesis. Neuroscience 464, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.050
Croy, I., Luong, A., Triscoli, C., Hofmann, E., Olausson, H., Sailer, U., 2016. Interpersonal stroking touch is targeted to C tactile afferent activation. Behav. Brain Res. SreeTestContent1 297, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.038
Cruciani, G., Zanini, L., Russo, V., Mirabella, M., Palamoutsi, E.M., Spitoni, G.F., 2021. Strengths and weaknesses of affective touch studies over the lifetime: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 127, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.012
Dal Monte, O., Costa, V.D., Noble, P.L., Murray, E.A., Averbeck, B.B., 2015. Amygdala lesions in rhesus macaques decrease attention to threat. Nat. Commun. 6, 10161.
Devine, S.L., Walker, S.C., Makdani, A., Stockton, E.R., McFarquhar, M.J., McGlone, F.P., Trotter, P.D., 2020. Childhood Adversity and Affective Touch Perception: A Comparison of United Kingdom Care Leavers and Non-care Leavers. Front. Psychol. 11.
Ellingsen, D.-M., Wessberg, J., Chelnokova, O., Olausson, H., Laeng, B., Leknes, S., 2014. In touch with your emotions: Oxytocin and touch change social impressions while others’ facial expressions can alter touch. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017
Field, T., 2010. Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Dev. Rev. 30, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.01.001
Gallace, A., Spence, C., 2016. Social Touch, in: Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F. (Eds.), Affective Touch and the Neurophysiology of CT Afferents. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6418-5_14
Gordon, I., Voos, A.C., Bennett, R.H., Bolling, D.Z., Pelphrey, K.A., Kaiser, M.D., 2013. Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21480
Grewen, K.M., Girdler, S.S., Amico, J., Light, K.C., 2005. Effects of partner support on resting oxytocin, cortisol, norepinephrine, and blood pressure before and after warm partner contact. Psychosom. Med. 67, 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000170341.88395.47
Gulledge, A., Hill, M., Lister, Z., Sallion, C., 2007. Non-Erotic Physical Affection: It’s Good for You, in: Low-Cost Approaches to Promote Physical and Mental Health: Theory, Research, and Practice. pp. 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36899-X_18
Gusso, M. de M., Serur, G., Nohama, P., 2021. Pupil Reactions to Tactile Stimulation: A Systematic Review. Front. Neurosci. 15.
Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., Ehlert, U., 2003. Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00465-7
Henricson, M., Berglund, A.-L., Määttä, S., Ekman, R., Segesten, K., 2008. The outcome of tactile touch on oxytocin in intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Nurs. 17, 2624–2633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02324.x
Hertenstein, M.J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B.A., Jaskolka, A.R., 2006. Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion 6, 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528
Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., Iwamura, Y., 1996. Attention-induced neuronal activity in the monkey somatosensory cortex revealed by pupillometrics. Neurosci. Res. 25, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0102(96)01043-7
Joshi, S., Gold, J.I., 2020. Pupil size as a window on neural substrates of cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.03.005
Kappers, A.M.L., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., 2013. Haptic perception. WIREs Cogn. Sci. 4, 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1238
Kirsch, L.P., Besharati, S., Papadaki, C., Crucianelli, L., Bertagnoli, S., Ward, N., Moro, V., Jenkinson, P.M., Fotopoulou, A., 2020. Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch. eLife 9, e47895. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47895
Laeng, B., Falkenberg, L., 2007. Women’s pupillary responses to sexually significant others during the hormonal cycle. Horm. Behav. 52, 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.07.013
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., Gredebäck, G., 2012. Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. J. Assoc. Psychol. Sci. 7, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611427305
Lee, J., Cichy, K., 2020. Complex Role of Touch in Social Relationships for Older Adults’ Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Res. Aging 42, 016402752091579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520915793
Lo, C., Chu, S.T., Penney, T.B., Schirmer, A., 2021. 3D Hand-Motion Tracking and Bottom-Up Classification Sheds Light on the Physical Properties of Gentle Stroking. Neuroscience, The Neurobiology of Social and Affective Touch 464, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.037
Löken, L.S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., Olausson, H., 2009. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2312
Mazza, A., Cariola, M., Capiotto, F., Diano, M., Schintu, S., Pia, L., Dal Monte, O., 2023a. Hedonic and autonomic responses in promoting affective touch. Sci. Rep. 13, 11201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37471-9
Mazza, A., Ciorli, T., Mirlisenna, I., D’Onofrio, I., Mantellino, S., Zaccaria, M., Pia, L., Dal Monte, O., 2023b. Pain perception and physiological responses are modulated by active support from a romantic partner. Psychophysiology 60, e14299. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14299
McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., Olausson, H., 2014. Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron 82, 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.001
Morad, Y., Lemberg, H., Yofe, N., Dagan, Y., 2000. Pupillography as an objective indicator of fatigue. Curr. Eye Res. 21, 535–542.
Morrison, I., 2016a. Keep Calm and Cuddle on: Social Touch as a Stress Buffer. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 2, 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0052-x
Morrison, I., 2016b. CT Afferent-Mediated Affective Touch: Brain Networks and Functional Hypotheses, in: Affective Touch and the Neurophysiology of CT Afferents. pp. 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6418-5_12
Morrison, I., Löken, L.S., Olausson, H., 2010. The skin as a social organ. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2007-y
Nava, E., Etzi, R., Gallace, A., Macchi Cassia, V., 2021. Socially-relevant Visual Stimulation Modulates Physiological Response to Affective Touch in Human Infants. Neuroscience 464, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.007
Novembre, G., Etzi, R., Morrison, I., 2021. Hedonic Responses to Touch are Modulated by the Perceived Attractiveness of the Caresser. Neuroscience, The Neurobiology of Social and Affective Touch 464, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.10.007
Olausson, H.W., Cole, J., Vallbo, Å., McGlone, F., Elam, M., Krämer, H.H., Rylander, K., Wessberg, J., Bushnell, M.C., 2008. Unmyelinated tactile afferents have opposite effects on insular and somatosensory cortical processing. Neurosci. Lett. 436, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.015
Oliva, M., Anikin, A., 2018. Pupil dilation reflects the time course of emotion recognition in human vocalizations. Sci. Rep. 8, 4871. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23265-x
Pagliaccio, D., Pine, D.S., Leibenluft, E., Dal Monte, O., Averbeck, B.B., Costa, V.D., 2019. Cross-species convergence in pupillary response: understanding human anxiety via non-human primate amygdala lesion. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 14, 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz041
Partala, T., Surakka, V., 2003. Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., Applications of Affective Computing in Human-Computer Interaction 59, 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X
Pawling, R., Cannon, P.R., McGlone, F.P., Walker, S.C., 2017. C-tactile afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value. PloS One 12, e0173457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173457
Pfabigan, D.M., Frogner, E.R., Schéle, E., Thorsby, P.M., Skålhegg, B.S., Dickson, S.L., Sailer, U., 2023. Ghrelin is related to lower brain reward activation during touch. Psychophysiology n/a, e14443. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14443
Pyasik, M., Fortunato, E., Dal Monte, O., Schintu, S., Garbarini, F., Ciorli, T., Pia, L., 2022. Self-other distinction modulates the social softness illusion. Psychol. Res. 86, 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01549-8
Robinson, K.J., Hoplock, L.B., Cameron, J.J., 2015. When in Doubt, Reach Out: Touch Is a Covert but Effective Mode of Soliciting and Providing Social Support. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 6, 831–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615584197
Rudebeck, P.H., Putnam, P.T., Daniels, T.E., Yang, T., Mitz, A.R., Rhodes, S.E.V., Murray, E.A., 2014. A role for primate subgenual cingulate cortex in sustaining autonomic arousal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 5391–5396. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317695111
Sailer, U., Ackerley, R., 2019. Exposure shapes the perception of affective touch. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.008
Sailer, U., Triscoli, C., Häggblad, G., Hamilton, P., Olausson, H., Croy, I., 2016. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during 40 minutes of pleasant touch. NeuroImage 139, 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.031
Schirmer, A., Cham, C., Zhao, Z., Lai, O., Lo, C., Croy, I., 2022. Understanding sex differences in affective touch: Sensory pleasantness, social comfort, and precursive experiences. Physiol. Behav. 250, 113797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113797
Schirmer, A., Croy, I., Ackerley, R., 2023. What are C-tactile afferents and how do they relate to “affective touch”? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 151, 105236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105236
Sehlstedt, I., Ignell, H., Backlund Wasling, H., Ackerley, R., Olausson, H., Croy, I., 2016. Gentle touch perception across the lifespan. Psychol. Aging 31, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000074
Triscoli, C., Croy, I., Steudte-Schmiedgen, S., Olausson, H., Sailer, U., 2017. Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity. Biol. Psychol. 128, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.007
van Hooijdonk, R., Mathot, S., Schat, E., Spencer, H., van der Stigchel, S., Dijkerman, H.C., 2019. Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness. Exp. Brain Res. 237, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2
von Mohr, M., Kirsch, L.P., Fotopoulou, A., 2017. The soothing function of touch: affective touch reduces feelings of social exclusion. Sci. Rep. 7, 13516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13355-7
Walker, S.C., Marshall, A., Pawling, R., 2022. Psychophysiology and motivated emotion: testing the affective touch hypothesis of C-tactile afferent function. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 43, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.10.004
Wijaya, M., Lau, D., Horrocks, S., McGlone, F., Ling, H., Schirmer, A., 2020. The human “feel” of touch contributes to its perceived pleasantness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 46, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000705
Willemse, C.J.A.M., Toet, A., van Erp, J.B.F., 2017. Affective and Behavioral Responses to Robot-Initiated Social Touch: Toward Understanding the Opportunities and Limitations of Physical Contact in Human–Robot Interaction. Front. ICT 4.
Wolfgang Ellermeier, Westphal, W., 1995. Gender differences in pain ratings and pupil reactions to painful pressure stimuli. Pain 61, 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00203-Q
Zheng, C.Y., Wang, K.-J., Wairagkar, M., Von Mohr, M., Lintunen, E., Fotopoulou, K., 2021. Comparing soft robotic affective touch to human and brush affective touch, in: 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). Presented at the 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 352–352. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC49131.2021.9517156