INTRODUCTION
Mean residence time (MRT) of an element is the average time taken by an
element from entry to exit in a system and can be estimated as the ratio
of pool size and input flux at the steady state (Sierra et al.2017). MRTs of ecosystem carbon (C), nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P)
(hereafter τ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P, respectively) are key ecosystem properties
influencing many ecosystem functions. For example,τ e,C is critically important for ecosystem C
sequestration potential and response of land C uptake to global change
(Luo et al. 2017). Friend et al. (2014) found thatτ e,C dominated the uncertainty in the modelled
land C response to future climate change and atmospheric
CO2 concentration. τ e,N andτ e,P are closely related to nutrient use
efficiency, which can be calculated as the product of net primary
production (NPP) per unit nutrient and nutrient residence time (Berendse
& Aerts 1987). Longer τ e,N orτ e,P contribute to more efficient N or P
conservation within the ecosystem to support plant productivity under
nutrient-limited conditions (Wang et al. 2018b). Understanding
drivers of τ e,N and τ e,Pis helpful in both studying the biogeochemical cycles of N and P, and
revealing mechanisms regulating τ e,C.
Variations ofτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P are complex and depend on multifaceted
interplay among climate, vegetation, soil, terrain, land use and
disturbance history. As an integrated outcome of multiple ecological
processes (e.g., plant respiration, phenology, plant C allocation, plant
mortality, organic matter decomposition and stabilization),τ e,C can vary from a few decades in the tropical
ecosystems to over 1000 years in wetlands at the high latitudes (Fanet al. 2020). Among various regulatory factors, how climate
affects τ e,C has been extensively studied at
global scale, partly due to the relative availability of high resolution
climate datasets. Mean annual temperature (MAT) was identified as the
most dominant control on the spatial pattern of globalτ e,C (Carvalhais et al. 2014; Fan et
al. 2020). The relationship
between τ e,C (or the MRT of soil C) and MAT was
found to be negatively linear or nonlinear, with a change in the slope
of the negative relationship towards the high end of MAT (Figure 1 of
Koven et al. (2017)) or around tropical/subtropical regions
(Figure 7 of Fan et al. (2020)). Using extensive field
observations in China, Wang et al. (2018a) identified both MAT
and mean annual precipitation (MAP) as the dominant drivers of the
spatial variation of τ e,C. But Wang et al.(2018a) did not quantify the influences of land use and disturbance
history, which were known to significantly influenceτ e,C (Sanderman et al. 2017). At regional scales,
vegetation, soil and terrain were also identified as important drivers
of τ e,C or components ofτ e,C. For example, a study along a 4000-km
natural transect in south America found that climate and soil
geochemical properties co-dominated the spatial variation of soil C
storage and turnover (Doetterl et al. 2015).
There are only limited studies focusing on τ e,Nor τ e,P especially at regional and global scales.
In general, τ e,P >τ e,N > τ e,Cbecause of the resorption by plants and immobilization by soil microbes
(Wang et al. 2010). Given the greater fraction of total ecosystem
C and nutrients in soil than in plants (Fan et al. 2020), the
relatively narrow range of C﹕N ratio of soil organic matter and strong
coupling of C and N cycles, spatial variations and key drivers ofτ e,C and τ e,N were
expected to be similar (Post et al. 1982; Post et al.1985). For τ e,P , the dominant drivers are likely
to be different because soil P is also strongly influenced by soil age
and geochemical properties (Walker & Syers 1976). Indeed, a recent
study by He et al. (2021) found that soil P concentration down to
1 m soil depth was strongly influenced by parental material, MAT and
soil texture globally, and also by topography at regional scale. A
recent study also found that the spatial patterns of ecosystem total N
and P down to 1 m soil depth were quite different, and that the younger
and slighter-weathered temperate soils had lower N﹕P ratio than the
subtropical and tropical soils in China (Zhang et al. 2021). So
far no studies have been on the dominant drivers of the regional or
global variations of both τ e,N andτ e,P.
Lack of reliable observations across a wide range of climate-,
vegetation-, soil- and terrain- related factors also limits the
quantifications of the patterns and dominant drivers ofτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P. Earlier studies either focused on one
category of drivers (Carvalhais et al. 2014) or individual
residence time only. Even for the relatively well studiedτ e,C, previous studies were subject to large
uncertainties with limited observations, such as poor information about
disturbance history (Wang et al. 2018b; Chen et al. 2020).
Estimate of MRT as the ratio of pool and input or output flux may have
large errors if the system is not at steady state (Lu et al.2018), which is true for most recently disturbed ecosystems.
In this study, we compiled the measurements of C, N and P pools of plant
biomass, surface litter and soil down to 1m depth, and site-specific 30
variables related to climate, vegetation, soil and terrain (see Methods)
of 127 mature and undisturbed natural forests in China. These intact
forests are fundamental in understanding ecological processes but have
been in sharp decline and are becoming rarer (Potapov et al.2017), which reflects the importance of this work. These forests span
from 22.24°N to 52.42°N, cover a wide range of climate and soil
conditions and represent all major forest types in China (see Methods).
This dataset allow us to thoroughly address the following questions: (1)
how climate, vegetation, soil and terrain influenceτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P? (2) whether a threshold exists in the
response of τ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P to air temperature? If so, what is the
likely mechanism?