Contributions of climate, vegetation, soil and terrain to the spatial variations of τe,C,τe,N and τe,P
To quantify the influences of different factors onτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P, we grouped those factors into four groups: climate, vegetation, soil and terrain (see Table S3), and estimated the contributions by each group to the total variance in the estimatedτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P among the 127 forest sites, respectively. Those four groups together explained 57%, 79% and 45% of the variances of the estimated τ e,C,τ e,N and τ e,P (see Fig. 3a-c). For individual effects, the greatest contributor was climate forτ e,C (21%) and τ e,N(14%), but was soil for τ e,P (16%). Soil was the second largest contributor to the variance ofτ e,C through its individual effect and interaction with climate, and terrain had the smallest influence on the variance of the τ e,C. Vegetation, soil and terrain contributed equally to the variance ofτ e,N through their direct effects and interactions with others. For τ e,P, vegetation was the smallest contributor, and soil and terrain had similar influences, and interactive effect of climate and terrain was strongest.
Given the importance of climate to all three mean ecosystem residence times, we further analysed the correlations betweenτ e,C,τ e,N or τ e,P and different climate variables (see Fig. 5), and found that correlation coefficients were highest with T min. Correlations were also significant with MAT and MAP for τ e,C,τ e,N and τ e,P because of the significant correlations between T min and MAT or MAP (see Figure S1).
For ecosystem C, C input increased linearly withT min with no significant difference in its response to T min betweenT min < 1.5 ℃ andT min > 1.5 ℃ (see Fig. 4a), whereas responses of both ecosystem C pool size and τ e,Cto T min decreased linearly with an increase inT min when T min was below their respective breakpoint (-0.9 ℃ for τ e,C, 1 ℃ for ecosystem C pool), but increased with T minwhen T min was above their respective breakpoint (see Fig. 4d and 4g), and those changes in the responses below and above the breakpoints were statistically significant. The change in the direction of τ e,C largely resulted from the change of the sensitivity of ecosystem C pool size rather than NPP, as the breaking point for NPP was insignificant (see Fig. 4a).
For ecosystem N, only the sensitivity of N input (deposition and biological N fixation) to T min had a breaking point at T min of -6.9 ℃ (see Fig. 4b), the sensitivities of both ecosystem N and τ e,Ndecreased with an increase in T min without a significant breaking point (see Fig. 4e and 4h).
For ecosystem P, the sensitivity of external P input (deposition and weathering) increased with T min whenT min < -2.5 ℃, but decreased with an increase in T min when T min> -2.5 ℃ (see Fig. 4c), and the sensitivity of ecosystem P pool size varied with T min with two breaking points at T min = -12.9 ℃ and -2.1 ℃, see Fig. 4f), and both breaking points were statistically significant (p< 0.05). τ e,P decreased with an increase in T min when T min< 0.2 ℃, and increased with T min whenT min > 0.2 ℃ (see Fig. 4i).
In summary, both τ e,C andτ e,P had a breaking point aroundT min = 0 ℃, which largely resulted from changes in the directions of the sensitivity of ecosystem C pool size and external P input, respectively.