Contributions of climate, vegetation, soil and terrain to the
spatial variations of τe,C,τe,N and τe,P
To quantify the influences of different factors onτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P, we grouped those factors into four groups:
climate, vegetation, soil and terrain (see Table S3), and estimated the
contributions by each group to the total variance in the estimatedτ e,C, τ e,N andτ e,P among the 127 forest sites, respectively.
Those four groups together explained 57%, 79% and 45% of the
variances of the estimated τ e,C,τ e,N and τ e,P (see Fig.
3a-c). For individual effects, the greatest contributor was climate forτ e,C (21%) and τ e,N(14%), but was soil for τ e,P (16%). Soil was
the second largest contributor to the variance ofτ e,C through its individual effect and
interaction with climate, and terrain had the smallest influence on the
variance of the τ e,C. Vegetation, soil and
terrain contributed equally to the variance ofτ e,N through their direct effects and
interactions with others. For τ e,P, vegetation
was the smallest contributor, and soil and terrain had similar
influences, and interactive effect of climate and terrain was strongest.
Given the importance of climate to all three mean ecosystem residence
times, we further analysed the correlations betweenτ e,C,τ e,N or τ e,P and different
climate variables (see Fig. 5), and found that correlation coefficients
were highest with T min. Correlations were also
significant with MAT and MAP for τ e,C,τ e,N and τ e,P because of
the significant correlations between T min and MAT
or MAP (see Figure S1).
For ecosystem C, C input increased linearly withT min with no significant difference in its
response to T min betweenT min < 1.5 ℃ andT min > 1.5 ℃ (see Fig. 4a), whereas
responses of both ecosystem C pool size and τ e,Cto T min decreased linearly with an increase inT min when T min was below
their respective breakpoint (-0.9 ℃ for τ e,C, 1 ℃
for ecosystem C pool), but increased with T minwhen T min was above their respective breakpoint
(see Fig. 4d and 4g), and those changes in the responses below and above
the breakpoints were statistically significant. The change in the
direction of τ e,C largely resulted from the
change of the sensitivity of ecosystem C pool size rather than NPP, as
the breaking point for NPP was insignificant (see Fig. 4a).
For ecosystem N, only the sensitivity of N input (deposition and
biological N fixation) to T min had a breaking
point at T min of -6.9 ℃ (see Fig. 4b), the
sensitivities of both ecosystem N and τ e,Ndecreased with an increase in T min without a
significant breaking point (see Fig. 4e and 4h).
For ecosystem P, the sensitivity of external P input (deposition and
weathering) increased with T min whenT min < -2.5 ℃, but decreased with an
increase in T min when T min> -2.5 ℃ (see Fig. 4c), and the sensitivity of ecosystem P
pool size varied with T min with two breaking
points at T min = -12.9 ℃ and -2.1 ℃, see Fig.
4f), and both breaking points were statistically significant (p< 0.05). τ e,P decreased with an
increase in T min when T min< 0.2 ℃, and increased with T min whenT min > 0.2 ℃ (see Fig. 4i).
In summary, both τ e,C andτ e,P had a breaking point aroundT min = 0 ℃, which largely resulted from changes
in the directions of the sensitivity of ecosystem C pool size and
external P input, respectively.