1.4 Conclusion
From the findings on Greater Kudu dispersal in the study area, spatio-temporal changes of Greater Kudu population density was evident thus the null hypothesis that spatio-temporal distribution of dispersal areas of the Greater Kudu in Lake Bogoria landscape did not change in the last four years was rejected. It was recommended that factors contributing to changes in dispersal of Greater Kudu be assessed for enhanced conservation and by extension improved livelihoods in LBNR, Baringo County.
It was also observed that transect lines established in the year 2019 by Friends of Nature Bogoria with the aim conduct annual Kudu population counts are under-utilized. It was recommended that anthropogenic activities contributing to Greater Kudu habitat degradation be curbed by providing alternative livelihood sources, and enhancement of adoption of sustainable technologies including use of solar energy and climate-smart agriculture by the local communities.