Figure 3 Bonding strength of CS-MA to four types of hydrogels. (A) Process of hydrogel adhesion. (B-C) Adhesion energy (Force/width, F/w) of PAAm hydrogels varies with the coating and integrative time. *p<0.05 when compared with other groups. (D) Maximum adhesion energy of various hydrogels at optimized coating and integrative time. Small image is the T-peeling test of PAAm hydrogels.
To further confirm the stitching stability under deformation, the adhered PAAm hydrogels were stretched and compressed on an automated materials testing system. During the stretching, the hydrogels were broken before debonding (Figure S2), indicating strong adhesion. Moreover, the intact and stitched PAAm hydrogels withstood similar compressive stress of > 2.7 MPa (Figure S2), indicating that the mechanical strength was not weakened after suture.
Autoclaving is a commonly used and effective sterilization method but may sometimes damage the polymer network by inducing phase separation and aggregation 25. Therefore, the resistance of hydrogels to autoclaving is a crucial concern for their applications in cell culture and tissue engineering. To examine the alteration of adhesion energy before and after autoclaving, the adhered PAAm hydrogels were sterilized at 121°C for 30 min. As shown in Figure S3, the adhesion energy of PAAm hydrogels was not impaired by autoclaving, although the mechanical strength was reduced due to swelling. Since CS is known as a thermal stable polymer 26, the stable adhesion by CS-MA is likely due to the covalently crosslinked CS chains that were modified by N-acylation reaction 21. In contrast, the adhesion by other hydrogel adhesives, such as pristine chitosan27 and poly(acrylic acid)/Fe3+28, was unstable under varying conditions due to the ionic bonds of adhesive chains, which is unsuitable for sealing hydrogel-based microfluidic chips.
3.3 Mechanism of the adhesion between hydrogels viaCS-MA
The strong adhesion between the adhesive chains and the hydrogels’ network could be attributed to their topological entanglement11. To investigate the interface of bonded PAAm hydrogels, SEM was used and it revealed a dense interfacial zone with a thickness of 30-50 µm between two sheets after stitching (Figure 4A). This suggested that the CS-MA diffused into the porous hydrogels and was crosslinked inside the pores. In contrast, hydrogels without CS-MA treatment showed a clear interface (Figure 4B) and could be easily peeled along the interface, resulting in a low adhesion energy of ~1 N/m. The CS-MA diffusion into hydrogel was also visibly monitored using fluorescent FITC labeled CS-MA (Figure 4C and 4D). Since the CS-MA has lost the pH responsibility of CS (Figure 2A), it could diffuse into the hydrogel freely. Consequently, the CS-MA rich layer gradually thickened during coating but diffused away from the interface over the integrative time. The well permeation of CS-MA might be able to interlock the two hydrogels after polymerization and ensure strong adhesion 27. This explained why extending the coating time facilitated adhesion (Figure 3).