5.0. References
  1. Alfoldi, J., Di Palma, F., Lindbald-Toh, K. et al. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals Nature 2011 ; volume 477, pages587–591
  2. Benitez, H.A., Lemic, D., Villalobos-Leiva, A., Bazok, R., Ordenese-Claveria, R., Zipcovik, I.P. et al. Breaking Symmetry: Fluctuating Asymmetry and Geometric Morphometrics as Tools for Evaluating Developmental Instability under Diverse Agro-ecosystems, Symmetry; 2020; 12, 1789 doi:10.3390/sym12111789
  3. Buck, R.C. Advanced calculus. 3rd ed. Waveland Press 1962: 252
  4. Cocilovo, J.A., Fuch, M.L., O’Brien, T.G., Varela, H.H.Sexual Dimorphisms in Prehispanic populations of the Cochabamba Valleys, Bolivia, Advances in Anthropology, 2012; 03(01)
  5. Catania, K.C., Collins, C.E., Kaas, J.H. Organization of the sensory cortex in the East African Hedgehog (Atelerix albiventrix) Journal of comparative Neurology,2000; 421(2):256-274
  6. Chen, S.Y.Y., Lestrel, P.E., Ker, W.J.S., McCol, H.J.Describing shape changes in the human mandible using Elliptical Fourier functions, 2000; Euro.J. orthod. 22:205-16
  7. Daegling, D.J., Jungers, L.J. 2000. Elliptical Fourier analysis of symphyseal shapes in great apes mandibles, J. Hum. Evol. 39:102-7
  8. Dixon, A.D., Hoyte, D.A.N., Ronning, O. (editors) 1997.Fundamentals of Cranio-facial growth, Boca Raton, New York CRC Press Pp. 155-85
  9. Drake, A. G. & Klingenberg, C. P. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat., 2010; 175(3):289-301,
  10. Elliot, G. F. 2010. Developmental Biology, 8th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. pp. 266–287
  11. Escoufier, Y. Le traitment des variables vectorielles” Biometrics. International Biometric Society, 1973; 29(4):751-760
  12. Esquerré, D ,, Sherratt, E ,, Keogh, J. S.Evolution of extreme ontogenetic allometric diversity and heterochrony in pythons, a clade of giant and dwarf snakes. Evolution2017;71: 2829–2844
  13. Ferrario, V.F., Sforza, C., Guazzi, M., Serrao, A. Elliptic Fourier analysis of mandibular shape, J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol . 1996; 16:208- 217
  14. Ferreira-Cardoso, S., Billet, G., Gaubert, P., Delsuc, F., Hautier, L Skull shape variation in extant pangolins (Pholidota: Manidae); allometric patterns and systematic implications5Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2020, 188, 255–275.
  15. Gaubert, P., Antunes, A., Meng, H., Miao, L The complete Phylogeny of Pangolins: scaling up Resources for the molecular Tracing of the most Trafficked mammals on earth. Journal of Heredity; 2017; 109(4):347-359. Doi:10.1093/jhered/esx097
  16. Gaudin, T.J ,, Gaubert, P ,, Billet, G ,,Hautier, L ,, Ferreira-Cardoso, S ,, Wible, J.R. 2019. Evolution & morphology in: Challender DWS, Nash H, Waterman C, eds. Pangolins: science, socie y tand conservation.Cambridge: Academic Press.
  17. Gaudin, T.J ,, Wible, J.R.. The entotympanic of pangolins and the phylogeny of the Pholidota (Mammalia) Journal of Mammalian Evolution 1999; 6: 39–65.
  18. Hammer Φ. Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis; (Palaeontologicaz Electronica, 2013; 4; p9). http://palaeo-elec­tronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
  19. Hendrikse, J.L., Parsons, T.E., & Hallgriımsson, B.Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evol. Dev. 2007; 9393–401
  20. Hewitt, G.M., Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography or seeing genes in space and time. Mol. Ecol. 2001; 10, 537–549.
  21. Igado, O.O. Skull typology and morphometrics of the Nigerian local dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Nig. Journal of Physiol. Sc. 2017; 32,153-158
  22. .International Union of Conservation of Nature, 2018
  23. Iwata, H., Ukai, Y.A. Computer Program package for quantitative evaluations of Biological shapes based on Elliptic Fourier descriptors, J Hered. 2002; 93:384-5
  24. Klingenberg, CP and McIntyre, GS Geometric morphometrics of Developmental Instability; Analyzing patterns of Fluctuating Asymmetry with PAO.rocrustes methods, Evolution; 1998; 52(5): 1363-1375
  25. Klingenberg, C.P. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:623–635.
  26. Kuhl, F.P., Giardina, C.R. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour, Compute graph Image Process 1982; 8:236-58
  27. Leamy, L. Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice. V. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry Am. Nat., 1984.; 123, pp. 579-593
  28. Le Douarin, N.M., Kalcheim, C. 1999. (2ed.) The neural crest. New York, Cambridge University Press Pp.48
  29. Le Lievre, C.S. Restrictions of developmental capabilities in neural crest cell. Developmental Biology.1980; Vol. 77, Issue 2, pp. 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(80)90481-9
  30. Manoel, C., Prado, F.B., Caria, P.H.F., Groppo, F.C.Morphometric analyses of the foramen magnum in skulls of Brazilian individuals; its relation to gender. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 2009; 26:104-8
  31. Marquez, E. Sage: Symmetry and Asymmetry in Geometric Data Version 1.21 Mammals Division University of Michigan Museum of Zoology http://www-personal.umich.edu/~emarquez/morph/ © The Mathworks, Inc. 2014; 1984-2013
  32. Murphy, W ,, Eizirik, E ., Johnson, W.,Zhang Y. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals, Nature 2001a.;409: 614–618.
  33. Murphy, W ,, Eizirik, E ,, O’Brien, S ,,Madsen, O ,, Scally, M., Douady, C ,,Teeling, E, , Ryder, O ,, Stanhope, M ,,De Jong, W ,, Springer, M.. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics,Science 2001b; 294: 2348–2351.
  34. Noden, D.M. The control of Avian cephalic Neural crest cytodifferentiation: 1. Skeletal and connective tissues, Developmental Biology, 1978; Vol. 67, Issue 2, pp.296-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(78)90201-4
  35. Palmer, A.R., & Strocker, C. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.,1986; 17 :391-421
  36. Polak, M. 2003. Developmental Instabiity: Causes and Consequences, Oxford University Press, Pp. 102-104
  37. Richtsmeier, J.T., and Deleon, V.B. Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies. Orthod. Craniofac. Res., 2009; 12(3) :149-58.
  38. Rholf, F.J. 2015. The tps series of software, Hystrix, 26(1)1-4 DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264
  39. Rholf, F. J, Archie, J.W . A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shapes in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae ). Syst. Zool; 1984.; 33:302-17
  40. Samuel, O.M., Casanova, P.M., Olopade, J.O. 2017. Elliptical Fourier descriptors of outline and morphological analysis in caudal view of the foramen magnum of the tropical raccoon (Procyon cancrivorus ) (Linnaeus, 1758). Morphologie 312 1-10 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2017.06.001
  41. Sanger, T.J., Mahler, D.L, Abzhanov, A., and Losos, J.B. 2011. Roles for modularity and Constraint in the Evolution of cranial diversity among Anolis lizards. 1525–1542.
  42. Schmittbul, M., LeMinor, J.M., Schaaf, A., Mangin, P . 2002. The human mandible in lateral view; Elliptical Fourier descriptors of the outline and their morphological analysis. Ann. Anat. 184(2):199-207
  43. Singh, D. and Rosen, V.C. 2001. Effect of maternal body morphology, morning sickness, gestational diabetes and hypertension on fluctuating asymmetry in young women. Evol. Hum. Behav., 22(6) :373-84,
  44. Urbanova, P., Heja, P., Zatopkova, L, Safr, M. 2014. The asymmetry and Modularity of the hyoid bone, Int. J. Morphol., 32(1) :251-260, 2014