Nicholas J Elmer

and 2 more

In situ gauge networks are often used in hydrologic model calibration, but these networks are limited or nonexistent in many regions. The upcoming Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission promises to fill this observation gap by providing discharge estimates for rivers wider than 100 meters. SWOT observation utility for model parameter selection in regions devoid of in situ gauges is assessed using proxy SWOT discharge estimates derived from an observing system simulation experiment and Monte Carlo methods. The sensitivity of the parameter selection to measurement error and observation frequency is also evaluated. Single- and multi-point parameter selection are performed for ten sub-basins within the Susitna and upper Tanana river basins in Alaska. SWOT is expected to observe Alaskan river points 4-7 times per 21-day repeat cycle with 120-km swath coverage. For an expected SWOT measurement error of 35%, parameter estimation is successful for 50% (90%) of sub-basins using single- (multi-) point parameter selection. Decreasing observation frequency to simulate lower latitudes resulted in success for only 10% of midlatitude and tropical sub-basins for single-point selection, whereas multi-point selection was successful in 80% (60%) of midlatitude (tropical) sub-basins. Single-point parameter selection is more sensitive to measurement error than multi-point parameter selection. The results strongly support the use of multi-point over single-point parameter selection, yielding robust results nearly independent of observation frequency. Most importantly, this study suggests SWOT can be used to successfully select hydrologic model parameters in basins without an in situ gauge network.

John Volk

and 23 more

OpenET is a software system that makes satellite-based multi-model estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) accessible at multiple spatial and temporal scales over the U.S. Large-scale ET estimates fill a critical data-gap for irrigation management, water resources management, and hydrological modeling and research. We present the methods and results of the second phase of an intercomparison and accuracy assessment between OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, PT-JPL, geeSEBAL, SIMS and SSEBop) and a benchmark ground-based ET dataset with data from nearly 200 eddy covariance towers across the contiguous U.S. Processing steps for the benchmark dataset included gap-filling, energy balance closure correction, calculation of closed and unclosed daily ET, and multiple levels of data QA/QC. The dataset was split into three groups, phase I and II of the intercomparison and a reserve dataset for future studies. To sample satellite-based ET pixels, static flux footprints were generated at each station based on dominant wind speed and direction. Where data allowed, two dimensional flux footprints that are weighted by hourly ETo were developed and used for ET pixel sampling. A wide range of visual and statistical comparisons between satellite and ground-based ET were conducted at each station and against stations grouped by land cover type. Based on key performance metrics including bias, coefficient of determination, and root mean square error, model results show promising agreement at many flux sites considering the inherent uncertainty in station data. Remote sensing models show the highest agreement with closed station ET in irrigated annual cropland settings whereas locations of native vegetation with high aridity and some forested stations show relatively less agreement. The benchmark ET dataset was used to explore different approaches to computing a single ensemble estimate from the six model ensemble, with the goal of reducing the influence of model outliers and selection of weighting and data sampling schemes to reduce the influence of flux stations with sparse or extensive data records. We present the results from the model intercomparison and accuracy assessment and discuss model performance relative to accuracy requirements from the OpenET user community.

Nicholas J Elmer

and 4 more

The Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission will launch in 2021 to provide the first global inventory of terrestrial surface water. Although SWOT is primarily a research mission with key science objectives in both the oceanography and hydrology domains, SWOT data is expected to have application potential to address many societal needs. To identify SWOT applications, prepare for the use of SWOT data, and quantify SWOT impacts prior to launch, realistic proxy SWOT observations with representative measurement errors are required. This paper provides a step-by-step description of two methods for deriving proxy SWOT water surface elevations (WSE) from an Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) using the Weather Research and Forecasting hydrological extension package (WRF-Hydro). The first, a basic method, provides a simple and efficient way to sample WRF-Hydro output according to the SWOT orbit and add random white noise to simulate measurement error, similar to many previous approaches. An alternate method using the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) Large-scale SWOT Hydrology Simulator accounts for additional sources of measurement error and produces output in formats comparable to that expected from official SWOT products. The basic method is ideal for river hydrology applications in which a full representation of SWOT measurement errors and spatial resolution are unnecessary, whereas the CNES simulator approach is better-suited for more rigorous scientific studies that require a comprehensive error budget.