Valdeoso Patterson

and 8 more

Background: While most research has largely focused on medical risks associated with reduced quality of life (QOL) in survivors, sociodemographic and family factors may also play a role. Thus, we examined sociodemographic factors and family factors associated with survivor QOL, including adolescent’s cancer-specific stress, mother’s general stress, and mother–adolescent communication. Methods: Mothers ( N=80) and survivors (ages 10-23, N=50) were assessed 5 years following initial diagnosis. Mothers completed measures regarding sociodemographic background adolescent’s cancer-specific stress, mother’s general stress, mother–adolescent communication, and adolescent QOL. Survivors also reported on their own QOL. Two hierarchical multiple regressions examined predictors of: (a) mother’s report of adolescent QOL and (b) survivor’s self-report of QOL. Results: The final model predicting mother-reported adolescent QOL was significant, F(5,74)=21.18, p<.001, and explained 59% of the variance in QOL. Significant predictors included adolescent stress ( β=-0.37, p<.001), mothers’ stress ( β=-0.42, p<.001), and communication ( β=0.19, p=.03). The final model predicting survivor-reported QOL was also significant, F(5,44)=5.16, p<.01 and explained 24% of the variance in QOL. Significant predictors included adolescent stress ( β=-.37, p=.01) and communication ( β=-.31, p=.04). Sociodemographic factors were not a significant predictor of QOL in any model. Conclusion: Family stress and communication offer potential points of intervention to improve QOL of pediatric cancer survivors from mother and survivor perspectives. While additional research is needed, healthcare professionals should encourage stress management and strong mother–child communication to enhance survivors’ long-term QOL. Such interventions may be helpful, irrespective of known sociodemographic factors that often affect health.

Micah Skeens

and 6 more

Background/Objectives Little is known about the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the quality of life (QoL) of children with cancer, who may be more vulnerable to the pandemic’s effects. This paper examined: (1) associations between COVID-19 exposure and impact on QoL in children with cancer, and 2) potential moderation based on child’s cancer status (i.e., time since diagnosis, on/off treatment). Design/Methods Parents of children with cancer in the US were recruited February-April 2021 via Facebook and Momcology. Parents completed the Covid Exposure and Family Impact Scale a child quality of life measure. Controlling for parent age, income, child age, and child sex, we examined the indirect effect of COVID impact on the association between COVID exposure and child QoL, as well as the moderating role of cancer status. Results Children had lower QoL scores ( M=59.74) than previous reports of QoL in children with cancer ( t(735)=-6.98, p<0.001). Mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect (95%CI[-0.47,-0.13]): higher exposure was associated with higher impact ( a=0.47, p<0.001), which was then related to lower QoL ( b=-0.56, p<0.001). Treatment status did not affect this indirect path; however, the association between impact and QoL was stronger as time since diagnosis increased (95%CI[-0.08,-0.001]). Conclusions Parents who report greater COVID impact may also report lower QoL in their children with cancer, especially further from diagnosis. Clinicians should be aware of the negative impact of the pandemic on parents and screen for COVID-related distress. Additionally, results highlight the importance of long-term, family-centered care, regardless of children being on or off treatment.