Confined meandering rivers are bounded between valleys and they are limited in their lateral migration compared to free meandering ones. In this study, we designed a model-based analysis to investigate types of confined meandering rivers. To simulate cases, we used the model developed by (Bogoni et al. 2017) based on a semi-analytical solution for flow and bed morphology ((Zolezzi and Seminara 2001). According to the result of (Lewin and Brindle 1977) the categorization of this type of meandering river should be based on the potential of evolution. We defined a confinement ratio as the ratio between the confined valley width and the meander belt width that the river would theoretically reach without geological confinement. Such unconfined meander belt width has been computed through long-term morphodynamic model simulations. This differs from previous work (Camporeale et al. 2005), semi-empirically suggesting an unconfined meander belt being nearly 3 times the modeled, linearly most unstable, intrinsic meander length. Our results indicate the existence of four different types of confined meandering rivers, which represents the most important point of this work. Compared to previous work, our classification adds a new class and reclassifies one of the previous types. Our proposed classes are; “Moderately confined condition” for confinement ratio in the range 0.1-1, “Strongly confined condition” for confinement ratio in the range 0.03-0.1. For a smaller confinement ratio than 0.03 we obtain a low sinuosity, single thread river, and for a confinement ratio greater than 1, we retrieve a free meandering river. Preliminary testing of our model-based classification with data from real confined meandering rivers shows promising results.