Figure 1: Two pregnant syngnathids, a pipefish
(Syngnathus abaster ) and a seahorse (Hippocampus
guttulatus ; photo by Patrick Louisy).
Even though viviparity has evolved more than 150 times in vertebrates
(Whittington, Griffith, Qi, Thompson, & Wilson, 2015), most of our
knowledge on the necessary immune system adjustments derives from the
mammals’ female pregnancy. Here, immunological tolerance to
semi-allogenic embryos is achieved by the downregulation of both major
histocompatibility complex pathways (MHC I and II). So, what
evolutionary solutions emerged with syngnathid male pregnancy? Recently,
Roth et al. (2020) showed, by reconstructing the immune gene repertoire
of syngnathid genomes, that the evolution of syngnathid pregnancy
coincided with adjustments to the adaptive immune system. In seahorses
(genus Hippocampus ) and pipefish (of the genusSyngnathus ), both comprising species with a closed brood pouch
(where the risk of embryo rejection would be theoretically higher),
several genomic modifications of the MHC II pathway were uncovered,
involving either loss or modifications of strategic genes. Even though
the precise rearrangement of the MHC II pathway differed between the two
types of studied brood pouches, the end result is similar and indicative
of selection for lower immunological vigilance during the evolution of
pregnancy. Moreover, by analysing the expression of immune and pregnancy
genes in reproductive tissues, Roth et al. (2020) found considerable
overlap between male and female pregnancy, suggestive of a process of
convergent evolution.
The work of Parker et al. (2022), while seemingly flowing from the
leading-edge findings of Small, Harlin-Cognato, and Jones (2013),
Whittington et al. (2015) and Roth et al. (2020), introduced some
relevant methodological upgrades. To fully understand a dynamic process
such as pregnancy, where a myriad of cryptic mechanisms occur in orderly
succession, one needs to go beyond a couple of snapshots. Thus, Parker
et al. (2022) not only extended the inner brood surface tissue gene
expression analyses to four species, thus further solidifying the
validity of their results, but they also contrasted gene expression at
different pregnancy stages (nonpregnant, early, late and parturition),
in three distinct brooding architectures (external egg brooding surface,
inverted brood pouch, and sealed brood pouch; Figure 2).