Figure legends
Figure 1. A: Lateral and dorsal view of three larval of phyllomedusinae used as study models and diagrams with reference color codes of the tadpoles; B: dorsal and lateral view of P. vaillantitadpoles indicating areas from which color measurements were obtained in the three species.
Figure 2. Distribution of two species of phyllomedusine frog larvae along the water column under experimental conditions.
Figure 3. Relationship between body length and back conspicuousness (green) and interocular patch (orange) of three species of phyllomedusine frog larvae.
Figure 4. Palatability of three species of phyllomedusine frog larvae, measured as the proportion of larvae that were predated by odonates (N = 18 P. vaillanti , N = 9 P. bicolor , N = 11C. tomopterna ).
Figure 5. Differences in toxicity and conspicuousness in three species of phyllomedusine frog larvae (P.vaillanti, P. bicolorand C. tomopterna ). Saline injection was used as a negative toxicity control measure. The black dots indicate the median and the horizontal bars the 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 6. Correlation between toxicity and conspicuousness in three species of phyllomedusine frog larvae. The PC1 represents the conspicuousness of the back of the body and PC2 the conspicuousness of the interocular patch.