DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data for this article are available at the Dayad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.j3tx95xfs
Fig. 1 Map of the study area and its position within Sichuan Province (the red area in the inset). The circles represent the fixed sample sites, and the circles with crosses represent the sample sites not surveyed due to landslides in March 2018. The sample sites set up as supplements are represented by triangles in the figure.
Fig. 2 a, b and c Rarefaction curves of small mammal diversity across the three forest types (blue shaded regions, 95% confidence intervals).
Fig. 3 Small mammals taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity at the site scale and landscape scale for the three forest types. Black dots are outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences.
Fig. 4 Multidimensional scaling plot of small mammal assemblages among the three forest types
Fig. 5 Small mammals standardized effect size of mean phylogenetic distances and standardized effect size of mean functional distances at the site scale and landscape scale for the three forest types. Black dots are outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences. * indicates significantly different from 0.
Fig. 6 Small mammals taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity at the site scale and landscape scale for the three forest types across three seasons. Black dots are outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences among the three forest types.
Fig. 7 Small mammals standardized effect size of mean phylogenetic distances and standardized effect size of mean functional distances at the site scale and landscape scale for the three forest types across three seasons. Black dots are outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences among the three forest types. * indicates significantly different from 0.