DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data for this article are available at the Dayad:
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.j3tx95xfs
Fig. 1 Map of the study area and its position within Sichuan
Province (the red area in the inset). The circles represent the fixed
sample sites, and the circles with crosses represent the sample sites
not surveyed due to landslides in March 2018. The sample sites set up as
supplements are represented by triangles in the figure.
Fig. 2 a, b and c Rarefaction curves of small mammal
diversity across the three forest types (blue shaded regions, 95%
confidence intervals).
Fig.
3 Small mammals taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity at the
site scale and landscape scale for the three forest types. Black dots
are outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences.
Fig. 4 Multidimensional scaling plot of small mammal
assemblages among the three forest types
Fig. 5 Small mammals standardized effect size of mean
phylogenetic distances and standardized effect size of mean functional
distances at the site scale and landscape scale for the three forest
types. Black dots are outliers. Different letters indicate significant
differences. * indicates significantly different from 0.
Fig. 6 Small mammals taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional
diversity at the site scale and landscape scale for the three forest
types across three seasons. Black dots are outliers. Different letters
indicate significant differences among the three forest types.
Fig. 7 Small mammals
standardized effect size of mean phylogenetic distances and standardized
effect size of mean functional distances at the site scale and landscape
scale for the three forest types across three seasons. Black dots are
outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences among the
three forest types. * indicates significantly different from 0.