REFERENCES
Atickem, A., Stenseth, N.C., Fashing, P.J., Nguyen, N., Chapman, C.A., Bekele, A. et al. (2019). Build science in Africa. Nature , 570, 297-300.
Beall, J. (2013). The open-access movement is not really about open access. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society , 11, 589-597.
Björk, B.-C. (2017). Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges. Internal and emergency medicine , 12, 247-253.
Björk, B.-C. (2021). Why is access to the scholarly journal literature so expensive? portal: Libraries and the Academy , 21, 177-192.
Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable buisness of scientific publishing bad for science? In: The Guardian .
Chapman, C.A., Bicca-Marques, J.C., Calvignac-Spencer, S., Fan, P., Fashing, P.J., Gogarten, J. et al. (2019). Games academics play and their consequences: How authorship, h-index, and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences .
Cookson, R. (2012). Ecology, botany and zoology researchers not keen to pay open access publication charges, and have limited ability to do so.Editors’ Bulletin , 8, 11-23.
Else, H. (2018). Radical plan to end paywalls. Nature , 561, 17-18.
Else, H. (2021). A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishing. Nature .
Green, T. (2019). Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet‐era transformation of scholarly communications. Learned Publishing , 32, 13-25.
Laurance, W.F., Clements, G.R., Sloan, S., O’connell, C.S., Mueller, N.D., Goosem, M. et al. (2014). A global strategy for road building. Nature , 513, 229-232.
Niang, I., Ruppel, O.C., Abdrabo, M.A., Essel, A., Lennard, C., Padgham, J. et al. (2014). Chapter 22 Africa. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
Rabesandratana, T. (2018). European funders detail their open-access plan. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Solomon, D. & Björk, B.-C. (2016). Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ , 4, e2264.
Solomon, D.J. & Björk, B.C. (2012a). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 63, 98-107.
Solomon, D.J. & Björk, B.C. (2012b). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 63, 1485-1495.
Tang, M., Bever, J.D. & Yu, F.H. (2017). Open access increases citations of papers in ecology. Ecosphere , 8, e01887.
Teschke, O. (2018). Green, gold, platinum, nickel: On the status of open access in mathematics. EMS Newsletter , 60-63.
UN (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision, key finding and advance tables. In: ESA/P/WP.241 . United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
UNESCO (2021). How much does your country invest in R&D? http://uis.unesco.org/apps/visualisations/research-and-development-spending/ Last accessed May 6, 2021 2021.