Figure legends:
Figure. 1 (a) Time schedule of the experiment. (b) Idealized scheme ofT. repens plant developed after transplantation of parental
cutting to a control environment. Label: marked position of apical end
of transplanted parental ramet. This enabled determination of parental
ramet that developed prior transplantation to the control environment.
Figure 2. Effect of time since the last drought event (2W, 4W, 6W, 8Wversus Control) experienced by parental ramets on the production
of side branches (clonal offspring) of Trifolium repens . Means
and SE are shown. Columns sharing the same letter are not significantly
different from each other at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of 5-azaC on the mean offspring biomass(a) and number
of side branches(b) (offspring) of Trifolium repens . Means and SE
are shown. Columns sharing the same letter are not significantly
different from each other at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effects of time since last drought (2W, 4W, 6W, 8Wversus Control) and 5-azaC treatment (control versus5-azaC) on mean offspring biomass of Trifolium repens . Means and
SE are shown. Columns sharing the same letter are not significantly
different from each other at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Interactive effect of time since the last drought event (2W,
4W, 6W, 8W versus Control) and 5-azaC on mean offspring biomass
of 3 genotypes (A genotype, B genotype and C genotype) ofTrifolium repens . Means and SE are shown. Columns sharing the
same letter are not significantly different from each other at p
< 0.05.
Figure S1. Effects of time since last drought (2W, 4W, 6W, 8Wversus Control) on parental biomass of Trifolium repens .
Shown are means and SE.
Columns sharing the same letter are not significantly different from
each other at p < 0.05.
Figure S2. Effects of time since last drought (2W, 4W, 6W, 8Wversus Control) and 5-azaC treatment (control versus5-azaC) on parental biomass of Trifolium repens . Shown are means
and SE.
Columns sharing the same letter are not significantly different from
each other at p < 0.05.