Manoj Mohan

and 3 more

Objective To determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes in women with obstetric cholestasis. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of data published since 2010. Selection Observation studies with quantifiable data. Sample A total of 16748 patients with obstetric cholestasis from 21 studies were included. Methods A pre-defined protocol with extensive literature search plus other sources to obtain all possible articles was followed. All articles were evaluated and included in the study with specified criteria for the risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Score. A meta-analysis was performed with MOOSE specifications met. Main Outcome measure Prevalence of gestational diabetes in the obstetric cholestasis population. Results The prevalence of gestational diabetes in the obstetric cholestasis population was 13.9% (20 studies analysed). Gestational diabetes was seen more in the obstetric cholestasis group compared to the non-obstetric group (OR 2.129, 95%CI, 1.697 to 2.670,10 studies). Severe cholestasis has more gestational diabetes cases (OR 2.168, 95% CI, 1.429 to 3.289, 4 studies) compared to mild cholestasis. Conclusion There is a significant co-relation of gestational diabetes among the diagnosed obstetric cholestasis population. With a diagnosis of obstetric cholestasis is made, it is necessary to test for undiagnosed gestational diabetes further. This approach may reduce the risk of stillbirth in severe obstetric cholestasis cases. PROSPERO Registration number CRD42021223886

Manoj Mohan

and 5 more

Background The global effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on pregnancy and outcomes. There has been recently some conflicting evidence on the stillbirths during the COVID-19 pandemic. This meta-analysis attempts to resolve this through a systematic approach. Objectives To analyse and determine the impact of COVID-19 on the stillbirth rate. Search strategy We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science from inception to 05 March 2021 with no language restriction for this meta-analysis. Selection criteria Publications (a) with stillbirth data on pregnant women with COVID-19 (b) comparing stillbirth rates in pregnant women with and without COVID-19 and (c), comparing stillbirth rates before and during the pandemic. Data collection and Analysis The included studies were all observational studies, and we used the Newcastle Ottawa score for risk of bias. We performed the meta-analysis using Comprehensive meta-analysis software, version 3. Main results A total of 29 studies were included in the meta-analysis; from 17 of these, the SB rate was 7 per 1000 in pregnant women with COVID-19. This rate was much higher (34/1000) in low- and middle-income countries. The odds ratio of stillbirth in pregnant women with COVID-19 compared to those without was 1.89. However, there was no significant difference in population SB rates before and during the pandemic. Conclusions There is some evidence that the stillbirth rate has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but this is mainly in low- and middle-income countries. Inadequate access to healthcare during the pandemic could be a contributing factor.