References

  1. Baron, M. G., Norman, D. B. and Barrett, P. M. (2017a) ‘A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution’,Nature , 543(7646), pp. 501–506. doi: 10.1038/nature21700.
  2. Baron, M. G., Norman, D. B. and Barrett, P. M. (2017b) ‘Baron et al. reply’, Nature , 551(7678), pp. E4–E5. doi: 10.1038/nature24012.
  3. Catalano, S. A., Goloboff, P. A. and Giannini, N. P. (2010) ‘Phylogenetic morphometrics (I): the use of landmark data in a phylogenetic framework’, Cladistics , 26(5), pp. 539–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00302.x.
  4. Congreve, C. R. and Lamsdell, J. C. (2016) ‘Implied weighting and its utility in palaeontological datasets: a study using modelled phylogenetic matrices’, Palaeontology , 59(3), pp. 447–462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12236.
  5. Cracraft, J. (1974) ‘Phylogenetic Models and Classification’,Systematic Biology , 23(1), pp. 71–90. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/23.1.71.
  6. Crawford, N. G. et al. (2012) ‘More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs’, Biology Letters , 8(5), pp. 783–786. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331.
  7. Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S. and Mc Morris, F. R. (1975) ‘An idealized concept of the true cladistic character’, Mathematical Biosciences , 23(3), pp. 263–272. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(75)90040-1.
  8. Farris, J. S. (1969) ‘A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting’, Systematic Biology , 18(4), pp. 374–385. doi: 10.2307/2412182.
  9. Farris, J. S. (1979) ‘The Information Content of the Phylogenetic System’, Systematic Biology , 28(4), pp. 483–519. doi: 10.2307/sysbio/28.4.483.
  10. Goloboff, P. A. (1993) ‘Estimating Character Weights During Tree Search’, Cladistics , 9(1), pp. 83–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00209.x.
  11. Goloboff, P. A. (2014) ‘Extended implied weighting’,Cladistics , 30(3), pp. 260–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12047.
  12. Goloboff, P. A. and Catalano, S. A. (2016) ‘TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics’,Cladistics , 32(3), pp. 221–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160.
  13. Han, F. et al. (2017) ‘Postcranial anatomy of Yinlong downsi (Dinosauria: Ceratopsia) from the Upper Jurassic Shishugou Formation of China and the phylogeny of basal ornithischians’, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology , 0(0), pp. 1–29. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2017.1369185.
  14. Harrison, T. (1993) ‘Cladistic Concepts and the Species Problem in Hominoid Evolution’, in Kimbel, W. H. and Martin, L. B. (eds)Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution . Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 345–371. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_14.
  15. Hawkins, J. A., Hughes, C. E. and Scotland, R. W. (1997) ‘Primary Homology Assessment, Characters and Character States’,Cladistics , 13(3), pp. 275–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00320.x.
  16. Kälersjö, M., Albert, V. A. and Farris, J. S. (1999) ‘Homoplasy Increases Phylogenetic Structure’, Cladistics , 15(1), pp. 91–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00400.x.
  17. Kluge, A. G. and Farris, J. S. (1969) ‘Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans’, Systematic Biology , 18(1), pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/18.1.1.
  18. Laing, A. M. et al. (2018) ‘Giant taxon-character matrices: the future of morphological systematics’, Cladistics , 34(3), pp. 333–335. doi: 10.1111/cla.12197.
  19. Langer, M. C. et al. (2017) ‘Untangling the dinosaur family tree’, Nature , 551(7678), pp. E1–E3. doi: 10.1038/nature24011.
  20. Luo, Z.-X. et al. (2015) ‘Mandibular and dental characteristics of Late Triassic mammaliaform Haramiyavia and their ramifications for basal mammal evolution’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 112(51), pp. E7101–E7109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519387112.
  21. Nelson, G. J. (1972) ‘Phylogenetic Relationship and Classification’,Systematic Zoology , 21(2), pp. 227–231. doi: 10.2307/2412293.
  22. O’Leary, M. A. et al. (2013) ‘The Placental Mammal Ancestor and the Post–K-Pg Radiation of Placentals’, Science , 339(6120), pp. 662–667. doi: 10.1126/science.1229237.
  23. Sereno, P. C. (2007) ‘Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics’, Cladistics , 23(6), pp. 565–587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x.
  24. Shannon, C. E. (1948) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Communication’,The Bell System Technical Journal , 27, pp. 379–423.
  25. Shannon, C. E. (1949) ‘Communication in the Presence of Noise’,Proceedings of the IRE , 37(1), pp. 10–21. doi: 10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969.
  26. Simões, T. R. et al. (2017) ‘Giant taxon-character matrices: quality of character constructions remains critical regardless of size’, Cladistics , 33(2), pp. 198–219. doi: 10.1111/cla.12163.
  27. Sokal, R. R. (1966) ‘Numerical Taxonomy’, Scientific American , 215(6), pp. 106–117.
  28. Spaulding, M. and Flynn, J. J. (2012) ‘Phylogeny of the Carnivoramorpha: The impact of postcranial characters’, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology , 10(4), pp. 653–677. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2011.630681.
  29. Wang, H., Meng, J. and Wang, Y. (2019) ‘Cretaceous fossil reveals a new pattern in mammalian middle ear evolution’, Nature , pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1792-0.
  30. Wilkinson, M. (1995) ‘A comparison of two methods of character construction’, Cladistics , 11(3), pp. 297–308. doi: 10.1016/0748-3007(95)90017-9.
  31. Wilkinson, M., Cotton, J. A. and Thorley, J. L. (2004) ‘The Information Content of Trees and Their Matrix Representations’,Systematic Biology , 53(6), pp. 989–1001. doi: 10.1080/10635150490522737.
  32. Yu, C. et al. (2020) ‘A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia’,Communications Biology , 3(1), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7.