Figure 1. Crooked had a smaller but more diverse outbreak than Little Appleton. A&B) Outbreak size was much larger in Little Appleton than in Crooked both in terms of infection prevalence (left axis, dashed black line) and infected host density (right axis, solid blue line). C&D) There was no clear pattern of changing gene diversity over time in Little Appleton (panel C) or Crooked (panel D). Gene diversity was higher in Crooked than in Little Appleton when all sample dates were considered. Sample sizes are noted next to points; error bars show centered bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (Marcon et al., 2012).
Table 1. Results of AMOVA on structure over time.