References
1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027-35.
2. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller A-B, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. The Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162-72.
3. Ward RM, Beachy JC. Neonatal complications following preterm birth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;110:8-16.
4. Reddy UM, Rice MM, Grobman WA, Bailit JL, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, et al. Serious maternal complications after early preterm delivery (24-33 weeks’ gestation). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;213(4):538. e1- e9.
5. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;117(3):663-71.
6. Souza RT, Costa ML, Mayrink J, Feitosa FE, Rocha Filho EA, Leite DF, et al. Clinical and epidemiological factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth: a multicentre cohort of low risk nulliparous women. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1-10.
7. Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;218(2):161-80.
8. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage, Macnaughton M, Chalmers I, Dubowitz V, Dunn P, Grant A, et al. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1993;100(6):516-23.
9. Issah A, Diacci R, Williams KP, Aubin A, McAuliffe L, Phung J, et al. McDonald versus Shirodkar Cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMC Systematic Reviews. (Under Review).
10. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015;4(1):1.
11. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008-12.
12. Higgins J, Thomas J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Chandler J CM, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA editor 2019.
13. Jones H RJ. Te Lindes Operative Gynecology: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2015.
14. McDonald I. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1957;64(3):346-50.
15. Barter RH, Dusbabek JA, Tyndal CM, Erkenbeck RV. Further experiences with the Shirodkar operation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1963;85(6):792-805.
16. Shirodkar V. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299-300.
17. Caspi E, Schneider DF, Mor Z, Langer R, Weinraub Z, Bukovsky I. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation. American Journal of Perinatology. 1990;7(04):347-9.
18. Druzin M, Berkeley A. A simplified approach to Shirodkar cerclage procedure. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1986;162(4):375-6.
19. Endnote X9. Clarivate Analytics. Philadelphia, United States: Thomson Reuters; 2019.
20. Covidence systematic review software Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; [
21. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
22. Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366.
23. Schünemann H BJ, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editor(s). Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach (updated October 2013) GRADE Working Group, 2013. [Available from: guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html].
24. Review Manager (RevMan). [Computer program]. Copenhagen The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.
25. Higgins J, Green S (editor). Incorporating heterogeneity into random-effects models Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
26. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(6).
27. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Preterm labour and birth (NICE guideline 25) 2015 (updated 2019).
28. Mendes D, Alves C, Batel-Marques F. Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal. BMC Medicine. 2017;15(1):112.
29. Higgins J, Green S (editor). Computing NNT from a risk difference (RD). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
30. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The Length of the Cervix and the Risk of Spontaneous Premature Delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(9):567-73.
31. To M, Skentou C, Royston P, Yu C, Nicolaides K. Prediction of patient‐specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population‐based prospective study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;27(4):362-7.
32. To MS, Fonseca EB, Molina FS, Cacho AM, Nicolaides KH. Maternal characteristics and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery in twins. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;194(5):1360-5.
33. Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O’Neill L, Rebarber A, Paidas MJ, Young BK. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;96(3):346-50.
34. Sim S, Da Silva Costa F, Araujo Júnior E, Sheehan PM. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth risk assessed by transvaginal ultrasound following cervical cerclage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015;55(4):344-9.
35. Scheib S, Visintine JF, Miroshnichenko G, Harvey C, Rychlak K, Berghella V. Is cerclage height associated with the incidence of preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;200(5):e12-e5.
36. Miroshnichenko G, Visintine JF, Suhag A, Gerson A, Berghella V. Is cerclage height associated with the incidence of preterm birth in women with a history-indicated cerclage? American Journal of Perinatology. 2011;28(01):083-6.
37. Perrotin F, Marret H, Ayeva-Derman M, Alonso A, Lansac J, Body G. Second trimester cerclage of short cervixes: which technique to use? A retrospective study of 25 cases. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2002;31(7):640-8.
38. Rozenberg P, Sénat M-V, Gillet A, Ville Y. Comparison of two methods of cervical cerclage by ultrasound cervical measurement. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2003;13(5):314-7.
39. Odibo AO, Berghella V, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM, Nicolaides KH. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. American Journal of Perinatology. 2007;24(01):055-60.
40. Figueroa R, Crowell R, Martinez A, Morgan M, Wakefield D. McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019;32(20):3408-14.
41. Bartolo S, Garabedian C, Deruelle P, Debarge V, Ducloy-Bouthors A-S, Subtil D. Evaluation of a new technique of prophylactic cervical cerclage simplified from the Shirodkar cerclage: A pilot study. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2017;46(4):343-7.
42. Hume H, Rebarber A, Saltzman DH, Roman AS, Fox NS. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2012;25(12):2690-2.
43. Wong C-H, Chen C-P, Wang K-G, Sun F-J, Chen C-Y. Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2017;30(5):551-5.
44. Otsuki K, Nakai A, Matsuda Y, Shinozuka N, Kawabata I, Makino Y, et al. Randomized trial of ultrasound‐indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2016;42(2):148-57.
45. Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle M-F. No. 373-cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2019;41(2):233-47.
46. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline: Cervical Cerclage 2011 Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg60/.