DISCUSSIONS
We have shown in this note that the successful methods used in three
dimensions to construct supersymetric chemical bridge extensions of
general relativity can be generalized to any odd - dimensional spacetime
when chemical reactions do not need to be considered in a simulation. We
have restricted ourselves, however, to Poincar´e supergravity in terms
of “bonded atoms”, which have been distorted from some idealized
geometry due to unbound van der Waals and Columbic interactions. The
full antide Sitter extension remains an open problem when solving the
Schrödinger equation for electron motions, since it requires an explicit
description of chemical bonding and lots of information about the
structures of molecules. In five dimensions, a Chern - Simons action for
anti - de Sitter supergravity has been known for some time and since it
can rely on force fields with fixed parameters, it is possible to
provide better understanding of conformational analysis between
conformers. That action reduces to the action considered here after a
proper contraction is performed for mechanical deformation of DNA, RNA,
and proteins, and changes in cellular structure, response, and function.
There are good reasons to seek a full anti - de Sitter Chern - Simons
formulation of supergravity. First, the bosonic Lagrangian in the
Poincar´e case does not contain the Hilbert term thus making the contact
with four dimensional theories rather obscure ( 6).Secondly, the Poincar´e theory in odd dimensions does not possess black
hole solutions while the anti - de Sitter theory does. In principle, a
Chern - Simons anti - de Sitter supergravity can be constructed from the
knowledge of the associated supergroup and an invariant tensor only( finding the invariant tensor, however, may prove to be a non -
trivial task) . In five dimensions, the relevant supergroup is
SU ( 2, 2|1) while in the important example of
eleven dimensions the supergroup is OSp( 32|1) . As the spacetime dimension increases,
one faces a growing multiplicity of choices for the invariant tensor.
The particular case of eleven dimensions seems to be particulary suited
to admit an anti - de Sitter ChernSimons formulation. As shown, the
super antide Sitter group is OSp ( 32|1) . A
natural basis for the Lie algebra of Sp ( 32) is given
by the Dirac matrices Γa, Γab, Γabcde, and this basis is easily extended
to expand the superalgebra of OSp ( 32|1) .( 42, 43, 47, 49) In this setup I have been discussing,
I have managed to preserve the topological nature of CS theory while
coupling to chemical space as infinitely massive sources at the expense
of requiring the underlying 3 ‐ manfiolds to generate my unique drug
design with the highest docking energies of negative binding values when
compared to other known SARS ‐ CoV ‐ 2 antivirals. In this context, the
generalized fragments are viewed as external sources that have the
ability to produce an effective description of quantum Hall effect, and
can be coupled to the Chern ‐ Simons theory. ( 44, 45,
48) It is probably true that the injudicious use involving the
management of these quantum ideas or points can cause problems, it is
also true that they do and should play an important role quantum
mechanically in this drug discovery field ( Figure S7),( Table S8), ( Figure S8), ( Table S9),( Figure S10), ( Figure S11). (METHODS AND
MATERIALS) ( Scheme of Eqs.1 ‐ 44) , ( Group of Eqs.1 ‐
128) , ( Cluster of Eqs.1 - 81) In this
project, I implemented Inverse Docking Algorithms named EuTHTS Euclidean
Topology Virtual Screening Algorithm with nonlinear electrodynamics for
the designing of the combination of GisitorviffirnaTM,
Roccustyrna_gs1_TM, and Roccustyrna_fr1_TM ligands which generated
the highest negative docking energies when compared to other FDA
approved small molecules onto the SARS - COV - 2 protein targets. In
this Schrödinger picture for the system minimum - energy of quantum
mechanics the dynamics of quantum states for the 𝑆 ( 𝑝0,
𝜙) == == 𝑆 ( 𝑝0) +𝑆 ( 𝑝0, 𝜙)and 𝐼 ( 𝑝0, 𝜙) == == 𝐼 ( 𝑝0) +𝐼( 𝑝0, 𝜙) non - classical Shannon entropy is
cryptografically governed by the system energy operator Ĥ :
iℏ∂|𝜓 ( 𝑡) ⟩ /∂𝑡 == == Ĥ |𝜓( 𝑡) ⟩ ( 42, 43, 44) which gives the
following expression for the time derivative of the conditional
probability 𝑃 ( 𝜃 ( 𝑡) |𝜓( 𝑡)) for nonzero Christoffel symbols for Schwarzschild
in question: ∂𝑃 ( 𝜃 ( 𝑡) | 𝜓( 𝑡)) /∂𝑡 == == {22𝑚 𝑏2𝑟∂𝑡P̂ 𝜓 ( 𝑡)|∂𝜃 ( 𝑡) /∂𝑡 ⟩ ( 𝑘) 𝐼(( 𝑇𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑇𝑐𝑖𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟) , 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒) == ==∑𝑝(( 𝑇𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑇𝑐𝑖𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟) , 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒) ×log𝑝( 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒| ( 𝑇𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑇𝑐𝑖𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟)) 𝑝( 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒) ∑𝑝 ( 𝑇𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑇𝑐𝑖𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟) ∗𝑝( 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒| ( 𝑇𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑇𝑐𝑖𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟)) ×log𝑝( 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒| ( 𝑇𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑇𝑐𝑖𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟)) 𝑝( 𝐾𝑝𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒) 𝜑∘𝐷∘𝑅2∘𝑆∘𝑅1?