References
1. EVAR Trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair in
patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet 2005; 365: 2179-2186.
2. JT. Powell, MJ. Sweeting, P Ulug, JD. Blankensteijn, FA.
Lederle, JP. Becqueminand R. M. Greenhalgh. Meta-analysis of
individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials
comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic
aneurysm over 5 years. BJS 2017; 104: 166–178
3. HZ İşcan, EU Ünal, Sarıcaoğlu MC, Aytekin B, Türkcan B, BB
Akkaya, G Yiğit, HM Özbek, İ Civelek, U Tütün, CL Birincioğlu. Our
clinical approach to the last five year elective infrarenal abdominal
aortic aneurysm: Short term results. J VascSurg 2018;27(1):1-7.
4. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of
patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Elliot L. Chaikof, Ronald L.
Dalman, Mark K. Eskandari, Benjamin M. Jackson, W. Anthony Lee, M.
Ashraf Mansour, Tara M. Mastracci, Matthew Mell, M. Hassan Murad, Louis
L. Nguyen, Gustavo S. Oderich, Madhukar S. Patel, Marc L.
Schermerhornand Benjamin W. Starnes. J VascSurg 2018; 67:2-77.
5. Editor’s Choice: European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019
Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdomin l Aorto-iliac
Artery Aneurysms
Anders Wanhainen, Fabio Verzini, Isabelle Van Herzeele, Eric Allaire,
Matthew Bown, Tina Cohnert, Florian Dick, Joostvan Herwaarden, Christos
Karkos, Mark Koelemay, Tilo Kölbel, Ian Loftus, Kevin Mani, Germano
Melissano, Janet Powell, Zoltán Szeberin. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019;
57: 8-93.
6. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography–an increasing source of
radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357 (22) : 2277–2284.
7. Walsh SR, Tang TY, Boyle JR. Renal consequences of EVAR. J
EndovascTher 2008;15(1):73-82.
8. White HA, McDonald S. Estimating risk associated with radiation
exposure during follow-up after EVAR. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
2010;51(1):95-104.
9. Beeman BR, Doctor LM, Doerr K, Mc Afee-Bennett S, Dougherty MJ,
Calligaro KD. Duplex ultrasound imaging alone is sufficient for midterm
EVAR surveillance: a cost analysis study and prospective comparison with
CT scan. J Vasc Surg 2009 ; 50 (5): 1019-1024.
10. Gray C, Goodman P, Herron CC, Lawler LP, O’Malley MK, O’Donohoe MK,
McDonnell CO. Use of CDUS as a first line surveillance tool following
EVAR is associated with a reduction in cost without compromising
accuracy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012(44):145-150.
11. Noll R, Tonnessen BH, Mannava K, Money SR, Sternbergh WC. Long term
placement cost after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46
(1): 9-15.
12. Brazelli M, Hernandez R, Sharma P, Robertson C, Shimonovich M, Mc
Lennan G, Fraiser C, Jamieson R and Vallabhaneni SR. CEUS and/or CDUS
for surveillance after EVAR: a systematic review and economic
evaluation. Health Tech Assessment 2018 (Dec); Vol 22 (72):1-220.
13. Karanikola E, Dalainas I, Karaolanis G, Zografos G, Filis K. Duplex
ultrasound versus computed tomography for the postoperative follow-up of
endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Where do we stand now?
Int J Angiol 2014; 23(3) :155–64.
14. Collins JT, Boros MJ, Combs K. Ultrasound surveillance of
endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe modality versus computed
tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 2007;21:671–5.
15. Arko FR, Filis KA, Heikkinen MA, Johnson BL, Zarins CK. Duplex
scanning after EVAR: an alternative to CT. Semin VascSurg 2004; 17(2):
161-5.
16. Chaer RA, Gushchin A, Rhee R, Marone L, Cho JS, Leers S, Makaroun
MS. Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method
post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable
aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:845–9.
17. Harrison GJ, Oshin OA, Vallabhaneni SR, Brennan JA, Fisher RK,
McWilliams RG. Surveillance after EVAR based on duplex ultrasound and
abdominal radiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;42:187–92.
18. Manning BJ, O’Neill SM, Haider SN, Colgan MP, Madhavan P, Moore DJ.
Duplex ultrasound in aneurysm surveillance following endovascular
aneurysm repair: a comparison with computed tomography aortography. J
Vasc Surg 2009; 49: 60–65.
19. Sato DT, Goff CD, Gregory RT, Robinson KD, Carter KA, Herts BR, et
al. Endoleak after aortic stent graft repair: diagnosis by color duplex
ultrasound scan versus computed tomography scan. J Vasc Surg
1998;28:657–63.
20. Sandford RM, Bown MJ, Fishwick G, Murphy F, Naylor M, Sensier Y, et
al. Duplex ultrasound scanning is reliable in the detection of endoleak
following endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
2006;32:537–41.
21. Wolf YG, Johnson BL, Hill BB, Rubin GD, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK.
Duplex ultrasound scanning versus computed tomographic angiography for
postoperative evaluation of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:1142–8.
22. Ashoke R, Brown LC, Rodway A, Choke E, Thompson MM, Greenhalgh RM,
Powell JT. Color duplex ultrasonography is insensitive for the detection
of endoleak after aortic endografting: a systematic review. J Endovasc
Ther 2005; 12: 297–305.
23. Raman KG, Missig-Carroll N, Richardson T, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS.
Color-flow duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomographic scan in
the surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg
2003;38(4):645–651
24. Elkouri S, Panneton JM, Andrews JC, et al. Computed tomography and
ultrasound in follow-up of patients after endovascular repair of
abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2004;18(3): 271–279
25. Bakken AM, Illig KA. Long term follow up after endovascular aneurysm
repair: Is ultrasound alone enough? Perspectives in Vasc Surg Endovasc
Therapy 2010; 22(3): 145-151.
26.
E
Jean-Baptiste, P
Feugier, C
Cruzel,
G
Sarlon-Bartoli, T
Reix, E
Steinmetz et al. Computed Tomography-Aortography Versus Color-Duplex
Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Repair: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic-Accuracy Study (The ESSEA
Trial). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020 Jun;13(6):e009886.
27.Black SA, Carrell TW, Bell RE, Waltham M, Reidy J, Taylor PR.
Long-term surveillance with computed tomography after endovascular
aneurysm repair may not be justified. Br J Surg 2009;96:1280–3.
28. Dias NV, Riva L, Ivancev K, Resch T, Sonesson B, Malina M. Is there
a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
2009;37:425–30.
29. MJ Grima, M Boufia, M Lawd, D Jacksond, K Stenson, B Patterson, I
Loftus, M Thompson, A Karthikesalingama, P Holt. Editor’s Choice – The
Implications of Non-compliance to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc
Surg 2018 April; 55(4): 492–502.
30. Schmieder GC, Stout CL, Stokes GK, Parent FN, Panneton JM. Endoleak
after endovascular aneurysm repair: duplex ultrasound imaging is better
than computed tomography at determining the need for intervention. J
Vasc Surg 2009;50(5):1012–1017, discussion 1017–1018
31. Henao EA, Hogde MD, Felkal DD, McCollum CH, Noon GP, Lin PH. CEUS
duplex surveillance after EVAR: Improved efficacy using a continuous
infusion technique. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43(2): 259-264.
32. Parent FN, Meier GH, Godziachvili V et al. The incidence and natural
history of type I and II endoleak: a 5 year follow up assessment with
CDUS. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35(3):474-81.
33. Nagre SB, Taylor SM, Passman MA, et al. Evaluating outcomes of
endoleak discrepancies between computed tomography scan and ultrasound
imaging after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg
2011;25(1):94–100.
34. AbuRahma AF, Welch CA, Mullins BB, Dyer B. Computed tomography
versus color duplex ultrasound for surveillance of abdominal aortic
stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther 2005;12(5):568–573.
35. AbuRahma AF. Fate of endoleaks detected by CTA and missed by CDUS in
EVAR for iAAA. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13: 490-95.
36. Cantisani V, ricci P, Grazhdani H, Napoli A, Fanelli F, Catalano C.
prospective comparative analysis of CDUS,CEUS,CT and MR in detecting
endoleak after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;41(2): 186-92.
37. Cantisani V, Grazhdani H, Clevert DA, Iezzi R, Aiani L, Martegani A,
et al. EVAR: benefits of CEUS for monitoring stent–graft status. Eur J
Radiol 2015;84:1658–65.
38. Iezzi R, Basilico R, Giancristofaro D, Pascali D, Cotroneo AR,
Storto ML. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs CDUS imaging in the follow-up
of patients after EVAR. J VascSurg 2009;49(3):552-560.
39. Mirza TA, Karthikesalingam A, Jackson D, Walsh SR, Holt PJ, Hayes
PD, Boyle JR. Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus
computed tomography for the detection of endoleak after EVAR: systematic
review and bivariate meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
2010;39:418–28.
40. Tse DM, Tapping CR, Patel R, Morgan R, Bratby MJ, Anthony S, Uberoi
R. Surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:875–88.
41. Nordon IM, Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, Loftus IM,
Thompson MM. Secondary interventions following endovascular aneurysm
repair (EVAR) and the enduring value of graft surveillance. Eur J Vasc
Endovasc Surg 2010;39:547–54.
42. Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Hinchliffe RJ, Nordon IM, Loftus IM,
Thompson MM. Risk of reintervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm
repair. Br J Surg 2010;97:657–63.