Risk Factors: Labor Arrest
Nulliparous Group
Nulliparous Group
Nulliparous Group
Nulliparous Group
Parous Group
Parous Group
Parous Group
Parous Group
Wald O.R. %95 C.I. p Wald O.R. %95 C.I. p
Anterior Abdominal Wall Adipose Thickness 1,219 1,239 0,847-1,814 0,269 0,129 1,093 0,672-1,777 0,720
Femur Adipose Thickness 2,684 1,539 0,919-2,578 0,101 3,966 1,799 1,009-3,207 0,046
Humerus Adipose Thickness 10,355 2,682 1,471-4,891 0,001 2,989 1,708 0,931-3,133 0,084
Total Adipose Tissue Thickness 23,661 1,605 1,327-1,942 <0,001 14,877 1,495 1,219-1,833 <0,001
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Wald: test statistic value. Since the dependent variable consists of 2 groups, binary logistic regression used. Enter method used in analysis. Hosmer and Lemeshow test p values: 0.859, 0.845 (for nulliparous group and parous group, respectively) and the models had good data compatibility.