References
1. Brunton G, Webbe J, Oliver S, Gale C. Adding value to core outcome
set development using multimethod systematic reviews. Research Synthesis
Methods. 2020;11(2):248-59.
2. Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic
reviews. Trials. 2007;8:39.
3. Duffy J, Hirsch M, Kawsar A, Gale C, Pealing L, Plana MN, et al.
Outcome reporting across randomised controlled trials evaluating
therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2017;124(12):1829-39.
4. Boers M, Beaton DE, Shea BJ, Maxwell LJ, Bartlett SJ, Bingham CO, et
al. OMERACT Filter 2.1: Elaboration of the Conceptual Framework for
Outcome Measurement in Health Intervention Studies. The Journal of
Rheumatology. 2019;46(8):1021.
5. Chevance A, Tran V-T, Ravaud P. Improving the generalizability and
credibility of core outcome sets (COSs) by a large and international
participation of diverse stakeholders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
2020.
6. Wuytack F, Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E. Towards core
outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of
outcomes in Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. 2015;4:73.
7. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes
ST, et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(3):280.
8. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiness Trials initiative
[Internet]. Available from: http://www.comet-initiative.org.
9. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, et al.
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness
research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99111.
10. Gorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Blazeby JM, Altman DG, Williamson PR.
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness
Research: An Updated Review and User Survey. PLoS One.
2016;11(1):e0146444.
11. Duffy J, Rolph R, Gale C, Hirsch M, Khan KS, Ziebland S, et al. Core
outcome sets in women’s and newborn health: a systematic review. BJOG.
2017;124(10):1481-9.
12. Core Outcomes in Womens and Newborn Health. CROWN initiative
[Available from: http://www.crown-initiative.org.
13. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, et
al. Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP
Statement. Trials. 2019;20(1):116.
14. Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, et
al. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD
recommendations. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002447.
15. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, et
al. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.
PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002148.
16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis
JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and
meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions:
explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
17. Duffy JMN, Hirsch M, Vercoe M, Abbott J, Barker C, Collura B, et al.
A core outcome set for future endometriosis research: an international
consensus development study. BJOG: An International Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;n/a(n/a).
18. Egan AM, Bogdanet D, Griffin TP, Kgosidialwa O, Cervar-Zivkovic M,
Dempsey E, et al. A core outcome set for studies of gestational diabetes
mellitus prevention and treatment. Diabetologia. 2020;63(6):1120-7.
19. Allin BSR, Hall NJ, Ross AR, Marven SS, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M, et
al. Development of a gastroschisis core outcome set. Arch Dis Child
Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;104(1):F76-F82.
20. Agha RA, Pidgeon TE, Borrelli MR, Dowlut N, Orkar TK, Ahmed M, et
al. Validated Outcomes in the Grafting of Autologous Fat to the Breast:
The VOGUE Study. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Research and
Audit. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(5):633e-8e.
21. Hirsch M, Duffy JM, Barker C, Hummelshoj L, Johnson NP, Mol B, et
al. Protocol for developing, disseminating and implementing a core
outcome set for endometriosis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e013998.
22. Duffy JMN, Bhattacharya S, Curtis C, Evers JLH, Farquharson RG,
Franik S, et al. A protocol developing, disseminating and implementing a
core outcome set for infertility. Human Reproduction Open. 2018;2018(3).
23. Whitehouse KC, Kim CR, Ganatra B, Duffy JMN, Blum J, Brahmi D, et
al. Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): a protocol for
developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for
medical and surgical abortion. Contraception. 2017;95(5):437-41.
24. Egan AM, Smith V, Devane D, Dunne FP. Effectiveness of prepregnancy
care for women with pregestational diabetes mellitus: protocol for a
systematic review of the literature and identification of a core
outcomes set using a Delphi survey. Trials. 2015;16(1):356.
25. Smith P, Cooper N, Dhillon-Smith R, O’Toole E, Clark TJ, Coomarasamy
A. Core Outcome Sets in Miscarriage Trials (COSMisT) study: a study
protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018535.
26. Dadouch R, Faheim M, Juando-Prats C, Parsons J, D’Souza R,
Investigators C. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies on
Obesity in Pregnant Patients (COSSOPP): a study protocol. Trials.
2018;19(1):655.
27. Egan AM, Dunne FP, Biesty LM, Bogdanet D, Crowther C, Dempsey E, et
al. Gestational diabetes prevention and treatment: a protocol for
developing core outcome sets. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e030574.
28. Duffy JM, van ’t Hooft J, Gale C, Brown M, Grobman W, Fitzpatrick R,
et al. A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core
outcome set for pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016;6(4):274-8.
29. Healy P, Gordijn S, Ganzevoort W, Beune I, Baschat A, Khalil A, et
al. Core Outcome Set for GROwth restriction: deVeloping Endpoints
(COSGROVE). Trials. 2018;19(1):451.
30. Prins JR, Holvast F, van ’t Hooft J, Bos AF, Ganzevoort JW, Scherjon
SA, et al. Development of a core outcome set for immunomodulation in
pregnancy (COSIMPREG): a protocol for a systematic review and Delphi
study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e021619.
31. Viau-Lapointe J, D’Souza R, Rose L, Lapinsky SE. Development of a
Core Outcome Set for research on critically ill obstetric patients: A
study protocol. Obstet Med. 2018;11(3):132-6.
32. Khalil A, Perry H, Duffy J, Reed K, Baschat A, Deprest J, et al.
Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: study protocol for developing,
disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set. Trials.
2017;18(1):325.
33. Khalil A, Duffy JMN, Perry H, Ganzevoort W, Reed K, Baschat AA, et
al. Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core
outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin
pregnancies. Trials. 2019;20(1):35.
34. Smith V, Daly D, Lundgren I, Eri T, Begley C, Gross MM, et al.
Protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum core outcome
set (SIPCOS). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):61.
35. Nielsen K, Nielsen KK, O’Reilly S, Wu N, Dasgupta K, Maindal HT. K,
et al. Development of a core outcome set for diabetes after pregnancy
prevention interventions (COS-DAP): a study protocol. Trials.
2018;19(1):708.
36. Bogdanet D, Egan A, Fhelelboom N, Biesty L, Thangaratinam S, Dempsey
E, et al. Metabolic follow-up at one year and beyond of women with
gestational diabetes treated with insulin and/or oral hypoglycaemic
agents: study protocol for the identification of a core outcomes set
using a Delphi survey. Trials. 2019;20(1):9.
37. Webbe J, Brunton G, Ali S, Duffy JM, Modi N, Gale C. Developing,
implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000048.
38. Knol M, Wang H, Bloomfield F, Piet T, Damhuis S, Khalil A, et al.
Development of a Core Outcome Set and Minimum Reporting Set for
intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN (COSNEON):
study protocol for a Delphi study. Trials. 2019;20(1):511.
39. Allin B, Bradnock T, Kenny S, Walker G, Knight M. NETS(1HD): study
protocol for development of a core outcome set for use in determining
the overall success of Hirschsprung’s disease treatment. Trials.
2016;17(1):577.
40. Allin B, Ross A, Marven S, N JH, Knight M. Development of a core
outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis
treatment. Trials. 2016;17:360.
41. Oei W, Fledderus AC, Korfage I, Eggen CA, van der Horst CM, Spuls
PI, et al. Protocol for the development of core set of domains of the
core outcome set for patients with Congenital Melanocytic Nevi (OCOMEN
project). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and
Venereology. 2019.
42. Kelly LE, Jansson LM, Moulsdale W, Pereira J, Simpson S, Guttman A,
et al. A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study
protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey.
Trials. 2016;17(1):536.
43. Rada M-P, Pergialiotis V, Betschart C, Falconi G, Haddad JM,
Doumouchtsis SK. A protocol for developing, disseminating, and
implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence.
Medicine. 2019;98(37):e16876.
44. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Pidgeon TE, Wellstead G, Orgill DP, Group VS.
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for autologous fat
grafting to the breast. Int J Surg. 2016;31:104-6.
45. Hirsch M, Duffy JMN, Kusznir JO, Davis CJ, Plana MN, Khan KS, et al.
Variation in outcome reporting in endometriosis trials: a systematic
review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):452-64.
46. Tirlapur SA, Ni Riordain R, Khan KS, Collaboration E-C. Variations
in the reporting of outcomes used in systematic reviews of treatment
effectiveness research in bladder pain syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 2014;180:61-7.
47. Herman MC, Penninx J, Geomini PM, Mol BW, Bongers MY. Choice of
primary outcomes evaluating treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.
BJOG. 2016;123(10):1593-8.
48. Sadownik LA, Yong PJ, Smith KB. Systematic Review of Treatment
Outcome Measures for Vulvodynia. J Low Genit Tract Dis.
2018;22(3):251-9.
49. Rahn DD, Abed H, Sung VW, Matteson KA, Rogers RG, Morrill MY, et al.
Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical
outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. J Clin Epidemiol.
2011;64(3):293-300.
50. Wilkinson J, Roberts SA, Showell M, Brison DR, Vail A. No common
denominator: a review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs. Hum Reprod.
2016;31(12):2714-22.
51. Braakhekke M, Kamphuis EI, van Rumste MM, Mol F, van der Veen F, Mol
BW. How are neonatal and maternal outcomes reported in randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) in reproductive medicine? Hum Reprod.
2014;29(6):1211-7.
52. Dapuzzo L, Seitz FE, Dodson WC, Stetter C, Kunselman AR, Legro RS.
Incomplete and inconsistent reporting of maternal and fetal outcomes in
infertility treatment trials. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2527-30.
53. Smith PP, Dhillon-Smith RK, O’Toole E, Cooper NAM, Coomarasamy A,
Clark TJ. Outcomes in prevention and management of miscarriage trials: a
systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynaecology. 2019;126(2):176-89.
54. Koot MH, Boelig RC, Van’t Hooft J, Limpens J, Roseboom TJ, Painter
RC, et al. Variation in hyperemesis gravidarum definition and outcome
reporting in randomised clinical trials: a systematic review. BJOG.
2018;125(12):1514-21.
55. Malinowski AK, D’Souza R, Khan KS, Shehata N, Malinowski M, Daru J.
Reported Outcomes in Perinatal Iron Deficiency Anemia Trials: A
Systematic Review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(5):417-34.
56. Al Wattar B, Placzek A, Troko J, Pirie A, Khan K, McCorry D, et al.
Variation in the reporting of outcomes among pregnant women with
epilepsy: a systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015;195:193-9.
57. Duffy J, Hirsch M, Pealing L, Showell M, Khan KS, Ziebland S, et al.
Inadequate safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials: a systematic
evaluation. BJOG. 2018;125(7):795-803.
58. Townsend R, Sileo F, Stocker L, Kumbay H, Healy P, Gordijn S, et al.
Variation in outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials of
interventions for prevention and treatment of fetal growth restriction.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(5):598-608.
59. Meher S, Alfirevic Z. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised
trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth
prevention: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014;121(10):1188-94; discussion
95-6.
60. Rogozińska E MN, Yang F, Dodd JM, Guelfi K, Teede H, Surita F,
Jensen DM, Geiker NR, Astrup A, Yeo S. . Variations in reporting of
outcomes in randomized trials on diet and physical activity in
pregnancy: A systematic review. . Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Research. 2017;43(7):1101-10.
61. Perry H, Duffy JMN, Umadia O, Khalil A, the International
Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Twin–Twin Transfusion S.
Outcome reporting across randomized trials and observational studies
evaluating treatments for twin–twin transfusion syndrome: systematic
review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;52(5):577-85.
62. Smith V, Daly D, Lundgren I, Eri T, Bensteom C, Devane D.
Salutogenically-focused outcomes in systematic reviews of intrapartum
interventions: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Midwifery.
2014;30:151-6.
63. Begley CM, Gross MM, Dencker A, Benstoem C, Berg M, Devane D.
Outcome measures in studies on the use of oxytocin for the treatment of
delay in labour: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2014;30(9):975-82.
64. O’Reilly SL, Leonard Y, Dasgupta K, Terkildsen Maindal H. Diabetes
after pregnancy prevention trials: Systematic review for core outcome
set development. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2020;n/a(n/a):e12947.
65. Webbe J, Brunton G, Ali S, Longford N, Modi N, Gale C, et al.
Parent, patient and clinician perceptions of outcomes during and
following neonatal care: a systematic review of qualitative research.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018;2(1):e000343.
66. Webbe JWH, Ali S, Sakonidou S, Webbe T, Duffy JMN, Brunton G, et al.
Inconsistent outcome reporting in large neonatal trials: a systematic
review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019.
67. Allin BS, Irvine A, Patni N, Knight M. Variability of outcome
reporting in Hirschsprung’s Disease and gastroschisis: a systematic
review. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38969.
68. Ross AR, Hall NJ. Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials
and systematic reviews of gastroschisis treatment: a systematic review.
J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(8):1385-9.
69. Hines M, Swinburn K, McIntyre S, Novak I, Badawi N. Infants at risk
of cerebral palsy: a systematic review of outcomes used in Cochrane
studies of pregnancy, childbirth and neonatology. J Matern Fetal
Neonatal Med. 2015;28(16):1871-83.
70. Ioannidis JP, Horbar JD, Ovelman CM, Brosseau Y, Thorlund K,
Buus-Frank ME, et al. Completeness of main outcomes across randomized
trials in entire discipline: survey of chronic lung disease outcomes in
preterm infants. BMJ. 2015;350:h72.
71. Durnea CM, Pergialiotis V, Duffy JMN, Bergstrom L, Elfituri A,
Doumouchtsis SK, et al. A systematic review of outcome and
outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical
interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to
action to develop a core outcome set. Int Urogynecol J.
2018;29(12):1727-45.
72. Lourenco T, Pergialiotis V, Duffy J, Durnea C, Elfituri A, Haddad J,
et al. A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in
trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent
action is needed to improve quality of research. Neurourology and
Urodynamics. 2019;38(2):509-24.
73. Lourenço TRM, Pergialiotis V, Durnea CM, Elfituri A, Haddad JM,
Betschart C, et al. A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome
measures in randomized trials evaluating surgical interventions for
posterior vaginal prolapse to aid development of a core outcome set.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2020;148(3):271-81.
74. Lourenço T, Pergialiotis V, Durnea C, Elfituri A, Haddad JM,
Betschart C, et al. A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome
measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2019;145(1):4-11.
75. Rada MP, Jones S, Falconi G, Milhem Haddad J, Betschart C,
Pergialiotis V, et al. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of
qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core
outcome sets. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2020;n/a(n/a).
76. Pergialiotis V, Durnea C, Elfituri A, Duffy J, Doumouchtsis SK,
International Collaboration for Harmonising Outcomes R, et al. Do we
need a core outcome set for childbirth perineal trauma research? A
systematic review of outcome reporting in randomised trials evaluating
the management of childbirth trauma. BJOG. 2018;125(12):1522-31.
77. Simpson RC, Thomas KS, Murphy R. Outcome measures for vulval skin
conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J
Dermatol. 2013;169(3):494-501.
78. Iliodromiti S, Wang W, Lumsden MA, Hunter MS, Bell R, Mishra G, et
al. Variation in menopausal vasomotor symptoms outcomes in clinical
trials: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;127(3):320-33.
79. Potter S, Brigic A, Whiting PF, Cawthorn SJ, Avery KN, Donovan JL,
et al. Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a
systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(1):31-46.
80. Potter S, Harcourt D, Cawthorn S, Warr R, Mills N, Havercroft D, et
al. Assessment of cosmesis after breast reconstruction surgery: a
systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(3):813-23.
81. Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast
Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Systematic Review. Journal of the
American College of Surgeons. 2009;209(1):123-33.
82. Potter S, Browning D, Savovic J, Holcombe C, Blazeby JM. Systematic
review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix
use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg.
2015;102(9):1010-25.
83. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Herlin C, Goodacre TE, Orgill DP. Use of
autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction: a systematic review
with meta-analysis of oncological outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet
Surg. 2015;68(2):143-61.
84. Al Wattar BH, Teede H, Garad R, Franks S, Balen A, Bhide P, et al.
Harmonising research outcomes for polycystic ovary syndrome: an
international multi-stakeholder core outcome set. Human Reproduction.
2020;35(2):404-12.
85. Egan AM, Galjaard S, Maresh MJA, Loeken MR, Napoli A, Anastasiou E,
et al. A core outcome set for studies evaluating the effectiveness of
prepregnancy care for women with pregestational diabetes. Diabetologia.
2017;60(7):1190-6.
86. Jansen LAW, Koot MH, van‘t Hooft J, Dean CR, Duffy JMN, Ganzevoort
W, et al. A core outcome set for hyperemesis gravidarum research: an
international consensus study. BJOG: An International Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;n/a(n/a).
87. Al Wattar BH, Tamilselvan K, Khan R, Kelso A, Sinha A, Pirie AM, et
al. Development of a core outcome set for epilepsy in pregnancy
(E-CORE): a national multi-stakeholder modified Delphi consensus study.
BJOG. 2017;124(4):661-7.
88. Healy P, Gordijn SJ, Ganzevoort W, Beune IM, Baschat A, Khalil A, et
al. A Core Outcome Set for the prevention and treatment of fetal GROwth
restriction: deVeloping Endpoints: the COSGROVE study. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2019;221(4):339 e1- e10.
89. van ’t Hooft J, Duffy JM, Daly M, Williamson PR, Meher S, Thom E, et
al. A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent
Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):49-58.
90. Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M, Horey D, C OB. Evaluating maternity
care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth. 2007;34(2):164-72.
91. Perry H, Duffy JMN, Reed K, Baschat A, Deprest J, Hecher K, et al.
Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for
twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
2019;54(2):255-61.
92. Townsend R, Duffy JMN, Sileo F, Perry H, Ganzevoort W, Reed K, et
al. A core outcome set for studies investigating the management of
selective fetal growth restriction in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2019.
93. Dos Santos F, Drymiotou S, Antequera Martin A, Mol BW, Gale C,
Devane D, et al. Development of a core outcome set for trials on
induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study.
BJOG. 2018;125(13):1673-80.
94. Briscoe KE, Haas DM. Developing a Core Outcome Set for Cesarean
Delivery Maternal Infectious Morbidity Outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2019.
95. Meher S, Cuthbert A, Kirkham JJ, Williamson P, Abalos E, Aflaifel N,
et al. Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum
haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study. BJOG.
2019;126(1):83-93.
96. Bogdanet D, Reddin C, Macken E, Griffin TP, Fhelelboom N, Biesty L,
et al. Follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with gestational diabetes
treated with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents: a core outcome
set using a Delphi survey. Diabetologia. 2019;62(11):2007-16.
97. Webbe JWH, Duffy JMN, Afonso E, Al-Muzaffar I, Brunton G, Greenough
A, et al. Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome
set for neonatal research. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019.
98. Allin BSR, Bradnock T, Kenny S, Kurinczuk JJ, Walker G, Knight M, et
al. NETS(1HD) study: development of a Hirschsprung’s disease core
outcome set. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(12):1143-51.
99. Potter S, Holcombe C, Ward JA, Blazeby JM, Group BS. Development of
a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive
breast surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1360-71.
100. Moller MH. Patient-important outcomes and core outcome sets:
increased attention needed! Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(4):408-10.
101. Vermeulen E, Karsenberg K, van der Lee JH, de Wildt SN. Involve
Children and Parents in Clinical Studies. Clin Transl Sci.
2020;13(1):11-3.
102. Molloy EJ, Mader S, Modi N, Gale C. Parent, child and public
involvement in child health research: core value not just an optional
extra. Pediatric Research. 2019;85(1):2-3.
103. Keeley T, Williamson P, Callery P, Jones LL, Mathers J, Jones J, et
al. The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core
outcome set development. Trials. 2016;17(1):230.
104. Young B, Bagley H. Including patients in core outcome set
development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100
international delegates. Research Involvement and Engagement.
2016;2(1):25.
105. Jones J, Brown E, Volicer L. Target outcomes for long-term oral
health care in dementia: a Delphi approach. Journal of Public Health
Dentistry 2000;60:330–4.
106. Gargon E, Crew R, Burnside G, Williamson PR. Higher number of items
associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi
surveys. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019;108:110-20.
107. De Villiers M, De Villiers P, Kent A. The Delphi technique in
health sciences education research. Medical teacher. 2005;27(7):639-43.
108. Clayton M. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for
critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology.
1997;17:373–86.
109. Campbell SM, JA C. Consensus methods in prescribing research. J
Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26(1):5-15.
110. Bloor M, Sampson H, Baker S, Dahlgren K. Useful but no Oracle:
Reflections on the use of a Delphi Group in a multi-methods policy
research study. Qualitative Research. 2015;15(1):57-70.
111. Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to
determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations
for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS
Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.