LMM: Linear Mixed-effect model, es: Exposure Salinity,
o: Origin, lo: Location, p: Population,
li: Lineage. Estimates of variables were computed after
centering and standardizing the explanatory variables to a mean of 0 and
a s.d. of 0.5. Results are presented in both multimodel inference
procedure (Burnham & Anderson, 2003) and completed LMM to account for a
greater range of alternative, more parsimonious combinations of
explanatory variables with respect to their relative weight of
statistical support. The relative importance scores were also measured
for each variable based on their frequency within parsimonious models.
The variables with higher scores are considered more important than
those with lower scores, and therefore receive higher support as
potential correlates of movement distance. The significant level for the
model averaging and relative importance estimations was set at 0.05. ***
indicates P < 0.001, ** indicates 0.001 <
P < 0.01, * indicates 0.01 < P
< 0.05. |
LMM: Linear Mixed-effect model, es:
Exposure Salinity, o: Origin, lo: Location,
p: Population, li: Lineage. Estimates of variables
were computed after centering and standardizing the explanatory
variables to a mean of 0 and a s.d. of 0.5. Results are presented in
both multimodel inference procedure (Burnham & Anderson, 2003) and
completed LMM to account for a greater range of alternative, more
parsimonious combinations of explanatory variables with respect to their
relative weight of statistical support. The relative importance scores
were also measured for each variable based on their frequency within
parsimonious models. The variables with higher scores are considered
more important than those with lower scores, and therefore receive
higher support as potential correlates of movement distance. The
significant level for the model averaging and relative importance
estimations was set at 0.05. *** indicates P < 0.001,
** indicates 0.001 < P < 0.01, * indicates
0.01 < P < 0.05. |
LMM: Linear Mixed-effect
model, es: Exposure Salinity, o: Origin, lo:
Location, p: Population, li: Lineage. Estimates of
variables were computed after centering and standardizing the
explanatory variables to a mean of 0 and a s.d. of 0.5. Results are
presented in both multimodel inference procedure (Burnham & Anderson,
2003) and completed LMM to account for a greater range of alternative,
more parsimonious combinations of explanatory variables with respect to
their relative weight of statistical support. The relative importance
scores were also measured for each variable based on their frequency
within parsimonious models. The variables with higher scores are
considered more important than those with lower scores, and therefore
receive higher support as potential correlates of movement distance. The
significant level for the model averaging and relative importance
estimations was set at 0.05. *** indicates P < 0.001,
** indicates 0.001 < P < 0.01, * indicates
0.01 < P < 0.05. |
LMM: Linear Mixed-effect
model, es: Exposure Salinity, o: Origin, lo:
Location, p: Population, li: Lineage. Estimates of
variables were computed after centering and standardizing the
explanatory variables to a mean of 0 and a s.d. of 0.5. Results are
presented in both multimodel inference procedure (Burnham & Anderson,
2003) and completed LMM to account for a greater range of alternative,
more parsimonious combinations of explanatory variables with respect to
their relative weight of statistical support. The relative importance
scores were also measured for each variable based on their frequency
within parsimonious models. The variables with higher scores are
considered more important than those with lower scores, and therefore
receive higher support as potential correlates of movement distance. The
significant level for the model averaging and relative importance
estimations was set at 0.05. *** indicates P < 0.001,
** indicates 0.001 < P < 0.01, * indicates
0.01 < P < 0.05. |
LMM: Linear Mixed-effect
model, es: Exposure Salinity, o: Origin, lo:
Location, p: Population, li: Lineage. Estimates of
variables were computed after centering and standardizing the
explanatory variables to a mean of 0 and a s.d. of 0.5. Results are
presented in both multimodel inference procedure (Burnham & Anderson,
2003) and completed LMM to account for a greater range of alternative,
more parsimonious combinations of explanatory variables with respect to
their relative weight of statistical support. The relative importance
scores were also measured for each variable based on their frequency
within parsimonious models. The variables with higher scores are
considered more important than those with lower scores, and therefore
receive higher support as potential correlates of movement distance. The
significant level for the model averaging and relative importance
estimations was set at 0.05. *** indicates P < 0.001,
** indicates 0.001 < P < 0.01, * indicates
0.01 < P < 0.05. |
LMM: Linear Mixed-effect
model, es: Exposure Salinity, o: Origin, lo:
Location, p: Population, li: Lineage. Estimates of
variables were computed after centering and standardizing the
explanatory variables to a mean of 0 and a s.d. of 0.5. Results are
presented in both multimodel inference procedure (Burnham & Anderson,
2003) and completed LMM to account for a greater range of alternative,
more parsimonious combinations of explanatory variables with respect to
their relative weight of statistical support. The relative importance
scores were also measured for each variable based on their frequency
within parsimonious models. The variables with higher scores are
considered more important than those with lower scores, and therefore
receive higher support as potential correlates of movement distance. The
significant level for the model averaging and relative importance
estimations was set at 0.05. *** indicates P < 0.001,
** indicates 0.001 < P < 0.01, * indicates
0.01 < P < 0.05. |