References:

1. Almarzooq ZI, Song Y, Dahabreh IJ, Kochar A, Ferro EG, Secemsky EA, Major JM, Farb A, Wu C, Zuckerman B, Yeh RW. Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump or No Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):744-754.
2. Movahed MR, Talle A, Hashemzadeh M. In Patients with Cardiogenic, Shock Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump is Associated with the Lowest Whereas Impella with the Highest Mortality Regardless of Severity or Hospital Types Using the Large Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4517178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4517178
3. Panuccio G, Neri G, Macrì LM, Salerno N, De Rosa S, Torella D. Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Mar 25;40:101007
4. Moustafa A, Khan MS, Saad M, Siddiqui S, Eltahawy E. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jan;34:25-31.
5. Jin C, Yandrapalli S, Yang Y, Liu B, Aronow WS, Naidu SS. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Feb;34(2):E98-E103