References:
- Almarzooq ZI, Song Y, Dahabreh IJ, Kochar A, Ferro EG, Secemsky EA,
Major JM, Farb A, Wu C, Zuckerman B, Yeh RW. Comparative Effectiveness
of Percutaneous Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump or No Mechanical Circulatory Support in
Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Aug
1;8(8):744-754.
- Movahed MR, Talle A, Hashemzadeh M. In Patients with Cardiogenic,
Shock Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump is Associated with the Lowest Whereas
Impella with the Highest Mortality Regardless of Severity or Hospital
Types Using the Large Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4517178 or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4517178
- Panuccio G, Neri G, Macrì LM, Salerno N, De Rosa S, Torella D. Use of
Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022
Mar 25;40:101007
- Moustafa A, Khan MS, Saad M, Siddiqui S, Eltahawy E. Impella Support
Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc
Med. 2022 Jan;34:25-31.
- Jin C, Yandrapalli S, Yang Y, Liu B, Aronow WS, Naidu SS. A Comparison
of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute
Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous
Coronary Intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Feb;34(2):E98-E103