References

1. Vogelgesang A, Hasenfuss G, Jacobshagen C. Low‐flow/low‐gradient aortic stenosis—Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.Clinical cardiology. 2017;40(9):654-659.
2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Normal and Depressed Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(19):1845-1853.
3. Clavel M-A, Magne J, Pibarot P. Low-gradient aortic stenosis.European Heart Journal. 2016;37(34):2645-2657.
4. Clavel MA, Cote N, Pibarot P. Dilemma in the therapeutic management of low-gradient aortic stenosis. Curr Opin Cardiol.2017;32(2):147-151.
5. Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(20):1865-1873.
6. Clavel MA. Therapeutic Management of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: First Assess the State of the Schrodinger Cat Before Making a Decision.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5).
7. Levy F, Laurent M, Monin JL, et al. Aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis operative risk stratification and long-term outcome: a European multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(15):1466-1472.
8. Grupper A, Beigel R, Maor E, et al. Survival after intervention in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2014;148(6):2823-2827.
9. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med.2009;6(7):e1000100.
10. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377-384.
11. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-282.
12. Adda J, Mielot C, Giorgi R, et al. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;5(1):27-35.
13. Bagos PG, Nikolopoulos GK. A method for meta-analysis of case-control genetic association studies using logistic regression.Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2007;6:Article17.
14. Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, et al. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation. 2008;118(14 Suppl):S234-242.
15. Tarantini G, Covolo E, Razzolini R, et al. Valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction exceeding 0.50. Ann Thorac Surg.2011;91(6):1808-1815.
16. Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Senechal M, Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(14):1259-1267.
17. Mohty D, Magne J, Deltreuil M, et al. Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study. Circulation. 2013;128(11 Suppl 1):S235-242.
18. Melis G, Frontera G, Caldentey G, et al. Systolic volume index by Doppler echocardiography is an useful marker for stratification and prognostic evaluation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed).2013;66(4):261-268.
19. Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I, et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis.Circulation. 2013;127(23):2316-2326.
20. Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival.Circulation. 2013;128(16):1781-1789.
21. Tribouilloy C, Rusinaru D, Marechaux S, et al. Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(1):55-66.
22. Annabi M, Dahou A, Burwash I, et al. Aortic Valve Replacement is Superior to Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis independently of the presence of true severe stenosis.Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements.2019;11(2):246-247.
23. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical Low Flow, Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Reflects More Severe Disease and Poorer Prognosis: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment. In: Am Heart Assoc; 2006.
24. Ozkan A, Hachamovitch R, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Marwick TH. Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation. 2013;128(6):622-631.
25. Pai RG, Varadarajan P, Razzouk A. Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2008;86(6):1781-1789.
26. Sato K, Sankaramangalam K, Kandregula K, et al. Contemporary outcomes in low‐gradient aortic stenosis patients who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;8(6):e011168.
27. Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, Shiomi H, et al. High-versus low-gradient severe aortic stenosis: demographics, clinical outcomes, and effects of the initial aortic valve replacement strategy on long-term prognosis.Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017;10(5):e004796.
28. Dayan V, Vignolo G, Magne J, Clavel MA, Mohty D, Pibarot P. Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol.2015;66(23):2594-2603.
29. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Schaff HV, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction:result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients.Circulation. 2000;101(16):1940-1946.
30. Awtry E, Davidoff R. Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.Circulation. 2011;124(23):e739-e741.
31. Clavel M-A, Côté N, Pibarot P. Dilemma in the therapeutic management of low-gradient aortic stenosis. Current opinion in cardiology.2017;32(2):147-151.
32. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. European heart journal.2003;24(13):1231-1243.
33. Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, Jr., Reeder GS. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990;65(2):198-220.
34. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Acute and 30-day follow-up results in 674 patients from the NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Circulation. 1991;84(6):2383-2397.
35. Litvack F, Jakubowski AT, Buchbinder NA, Eigler N. Lack of sustained clinical improvement in an elderly population after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62(4):270-275.
36. Pereira JJ, Lauer MS, Bashir M, et al. Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol.2002;39(8):1356-1363.
37. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, et al. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(6):1214-1223.
38. Letac B, Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Koning R, Derumeaux G. Evaluation of restenosis after balloon dilatation in adult aortic stenosis by repeat catheterization. American heart journal.1991;122(1):55-60.
39. Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26(6):1522-1528.
40. Ben-Dor I, Maluenda G, Iyasu GD, et al. Comparison of outcome of higher versus lower transvalvular gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low (< 40%) left ventricular ejection fraction. The American journal of cardiology.2012;109(7):1031-1037.
41. Clavel M-A, Webb JG, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation. 2010;122(19):1928-1936.
42. Sathyamurthy I, Jayanthi K. Low flow low gradient aortic stenosis: clinical pathways. Indian Heart J. 2014;66(6):672-677.
Table 1 . Patients’ characteristics