*In the spring 2019 evaluation, this question was worded “What is your overall evaluation of the instructor: excellent (5) | above average (4) | average (3) | below average (2) | poor (1)” while in the Spring 2020 evaluation, this question was worded “Please indicate the overall teaching effectiveness of the instructor: excellent (5) | very good (4) | satisfactory (3) | fair (2) | poor (1)”
**In the spring 2019 evaluation, this question was worded “What is your overall evaluation of the course: excellent (5) | above average (4) | average (3) | below average (2) | poor (1)” while in the Spring 2020 evaluation, this question was worded “Please indicate the overall educational value of the course: excellent (5) | very good (4) | satisfactory (3) | fair (2) | poor (1)”
Percent of respondents that responded ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ to the prompt “Overall, how satisfied were you with the California Naturalist course you attended? Very satisfied | Satisfied | Somewhat Satisfied | Somewhat Unsatisfied | Not Satisfied”
Percent of respondents that responded ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’ to the prompt “How would you rate the performance of your lead instructor? Excellent | Very Good | Good | Needs Improvement | Poor”
Percent of respondents that responded ‘Yes’ to the prompt “As a California Naturalist, do you plan to volunteer in the coming year? Yes | No”
Retrospective pre/post course; percent of respondents that ‘strongly agree’ they are “capable of making a positive impact on the environment”