References
1. Berte B, Hilfiker G, Russi I, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30(11):2199-2204.
2. Pambrun T, Durand C, Constantin M, et al. High-Power (40–50 W) Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by Unipolar Signal Modification for Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2019; 12 (6): p. e007304.
3. Kottmaier M, Poppa M, Bourier F, et al. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Europace 2020;22(3):388-393.
4. Ejima K, Henmi R, Iwanami Y, et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of Empiric Thoracic Vein Isolation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Without Structural Heart Disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2017;28(3): p. 266-272.
5. Koichiro Ejima SH, Kyoichiro Yazaki, Shohei Kataoka, et al. Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2020. In press .
6. Bortone A, Brault-Noble G, Appetiti A, Marijon E Elimination of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram as an in vivo marker of transmural lesion creation: acute study in canines.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015; 8(4): p. 905-911.
7. Bortone A, Appetiti A, Bouzeman A, et al. Unipolar signal modification as a guide for lesion creation during radiofrequency application in the left atrium: prospective study in humans in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013. 6 (6): p. 1095-1102.
8. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, Patrawala RA. Atrial fibrillation ablation: ”perpetual motion” of open irrigated tip catheters at 50 W is safe and improves outcomes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2011; 34 (5): p. 531-539.
9. Winkle RA, Moskovitz R, Mead RH, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 52(1): p. 1-8.
10. Dhillon G, Ahsan S, Honarbakhsh S, et al. A multicentered evaluation of ablation at higher power guided by ablation index: Establishing ablation targets for pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30(3):357-365.
11. Chen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, et al. Ablation index-guided 50 W ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Procedural data, lesion analysis, and initial results from the FAFA AI High Power Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2019. 30(12): p. 2724-2731.
12. Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation.Europace 2017;19(5): p. 874-880.
13. Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, et al. High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2018; 29(11): p. 1570-1575.
14. Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, et al. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm 2019;16(2): p. 165-169.
15. Baher A, Kheirkhahan M, Rechenmacher SJ, et al. High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Novel Index of Esophageal Injury. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol 2018;4(12): p. 1583-1594.
16. Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Long-term outcomes after low power, slower movement versus high power, faster movement irrigated-tip catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm2020; 17(2):184-189
17. Castrejón-Castrejón S, Martínez Cossiani M, Ortega Molina M, et al. Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study. J Interv Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2020; 57(1):57-65.
18. Chinitz JS, Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, et al. Sites With Small Impedance Decrease During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Are Associated With Recovery of Pulmonary Vein Conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016; 27(12): p. 1390-1398.
19. Inaba O, Nagata Y, Sekigawa Masahiro, et al. Impact of impedance decrease during radiofrequency current application for atrial fibrillation ablation on myocardial lesion and gap formation.J Arrhythm 2018; 34(3): p. 247-253.
20. Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7 (6): p. 1174-80.
21. Reichlin T, Knecht S, Lane C, et al. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11(2): p. 194-201.
22. Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, et al. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2015; 43(3): p. 297-306.
23. Anter E, Tschabrunn CM, Contreras-Valdes FM, Buxton AE, Josephson ME. Radiofrequency ablation annotation algorithm reduces the incidence of linear gaps and reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation.Heart Rhythm 2014; 11(5): p. 783-790.