References:
1. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertility and sterility. 2016;106(2):244-50.
2. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia CR, Racowsky C. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction. 2016;31(11):2561-9.
3. Zhu L, Zhang R, Zhang S, Shi W, Yan W, Wang X, et al. [Chinese neonatal birth weight curve for different gestational age]. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics. 2015;53(2):97-103.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. Bmj. 1995;310(6973):170.
5. Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wang H, Chen GC, Yang J, Yu H, et al. Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection among multiple births: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2017;295(3):577-97.
6. Moini A, Shiva M, Arabipoor A, Hosseini R, Chehrazi M, Sadeghi M. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared with twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously: a prospective follow-up study. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2012;165(1):29-32.
7. Busnelli A, Dallagiovanna C, Reschini M, Paffoni A, Fedele L, Somigliana E. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility. 2019;111(2):302-17.
8. Tan J, Qi YN, Zhang J, Wang W, Zhang GT, Zou K, et al. The mediation effect of multiple gestations on the association between in vitro fertilisation and severe maternal morbidities: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ open. 2019;9(7):e022670.
9. Le Ray C, Pelage L, Seco A, Bouvier-Colle MH, Chantry AA, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with in vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2019;126(8):1033-41.
10. Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertility and sterility. 1999;72(6):1035-40.
11. Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, Osianlis T, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Human reproduction update. 2014;20(6):808-21.
12. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012(7):CD002118.
13. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016(6):CD002118.
14. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;49(5):583-91.
15. Tannus S, Son WY, Dahan MH. Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2017;34(6):741-8.
16. Harrison BJ, Hilton TN, Riviere RN, Ferraro ZM, Deonandan R, Walker MC. Advanced maternal age: ethical and medical considerations for assisted reproductive technology. International journal of women’s health. 2017;9:561-70.
17. Moaddab A, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Shamshirsaz AA, Schutt A, et al. Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2017;216:178-83.