References:
1. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C.
Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?
Fertility and sterility. 2016;106(2):244-50.
2. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L,
van der Poel SZ, Gracia CR, Racowsky C. Obstetrical and perinatal
outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction.
2016;31(11):2561-9.
3. Zhu L, Zhang R, Zhang S, Shi W, Yan
W, Wang X, et al. [Chinese neonatal birth weight curve for different
gestational age]. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of
pediatrics. 2015;53(2):97-103.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple
significance tests: the Bonferroni method. Bmj. 1995;310(6973):170.
5. Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wang H, Chen GC,
Yang J, Yu H, et al. Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes
associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
among multiple births: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on
cohort studies. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics.
2017;295(3):577-97.
6. Moini A, Shiva M, Arabipoor A,
Hosseini R, Chehrazi M, Sadeghi M. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of
twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared
with twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously: a prospective follow-up
study. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive
biology. 2012;165(1):29-32.
7. Busnelli A, Dallagiovanna C,
Reschini M, Paffoni A, Fedele L, Somigliana E. Risk factors for
monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility. 2019;111(2):302-17.
8. Tan J, Qi YN, Zhang J, Wang W,
Zhang GT, Zou K, et al. The mediation effect of multiple gestations on
the association between in vitro fertilisation and severe maternal
morbidities: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ open. 2019;9(7):e022670.
9. Le Ray C, Pelage L, Seco A,
Bouvier-Colle MH, Chantry AA, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. Risk of severe
maternal morbidity associated with in vitro fertilisation: a
population-based study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics
and gynaecology. 2019;126(8):1033-41.
10. Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK,
Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and
transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program.
Fertility and sterility. 1999;72(6):1035-40.
11. Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA,
Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, Osianlis T, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo
transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical
evidence. Human reproduction update. 2014;20(6):808-21.
12. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C,
Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in
assisted reproductive technology. The Cochrane database of systematic
reviews. 2012(7):CD002118.
13. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C,
Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus
blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016(6):CD002118.
14. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L,
van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage
embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive
outcomes. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal
of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
2017;49(5):583-91.
15. Tannus S, Son WY, Dahan MH.
Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age. Journal of
assisted reproduction and genetics. 2017;34(6):741-8.
16. Harrison BJ, Hilton TN, Riviere
RN, Ferraro ZM, Deonandan R, Walker MC. Advanced maternal age: ethical
and medical considerations for assisted reproductive technology.
International journal of women’s health. 2017;9:561-70.
17. Moaddab A, Chervenak FA,
McCullough LB, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Shamshirsaz AA, Schutt A, et al.
Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in
assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. European journal of
obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2017;216:178-83.