[image]
 
The model presents a modest coefficient of determination with a value of .205.  None of our parameter estimates are significant.  One potential issue is a bias in our sampling of Yelp venues.  Yelp only captures businesses that have been reviewed, and perhaps the propensity of residents’ in a PUMA to leave Yelp reviews is related to the PUMA itself; the model obviously does not capture this variation.  Perhaps the sample is defensible, but these predictors are not significant at the PUMA level for reasons of zoning and geography.
 
Our model for average minimum distance to a healthy venue is as follows: