The authors also note general success with the automated work, but very little about the specifics. For example, while more optimization steps are noted as required in some cases, the authors don't mention how many were in the initial processing, nor how many additional steps were required later. In all cases, the descriptions in this section are merely qualitative commentary, not a discussion of how many cases fit each pattern (e.g., broken bond, migration to a different adsorption site, etc.)
In general in automation, the associated scripts handle more and more cases with revision - without sharing the failures, it's hard to know how to scientifically improve on this work (or address with code revisions) without more details.