loading page

Effect of anti-rheumatic drugs on the clinical outcome of autoimmune rheumatic diseases patients infected with COVID-19: A systemic review and meta-analysis
  • +6
  • Qin-Yi Su,
  • Sheng-Xiao Zhang,
  • Jing Luo,
  • Ting Cheng,
  • He-Yi Zhang,
  • Yan Zhang,
  • Bing-Ru Zhao,
  • Chong Gao,
  • Cai-Hong Wang
Qin-Yi Su
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Author Profile
Sheng-Xiao Zhang
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Author Profile
Jing Luo
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Author Profile
Ting Cheng
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Author Profile
He-Yi Zhang
Shanxi Medical University Jinci College
Author Profile
Yan Zhang
Shanxi Medical University Jinci College
Author Profile
Bing-Ru Zhao
Shanxi Medical University Jinci College
Author Profile
Chong Gao
Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Pathology
Author Profile
Cai-Hong Wang
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

The immune deregulation and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) make patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) more susceptible to infection. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical outcome of COVID-19 in ARD patients with different treatments. PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science were searched to identify the relevant evidence up to March 20, 2023. The overall prevalence of COVID-19 in ARD patients was 0.061. The ARD patients with glucocorticoids (GC) treatment had the highest prevalence[0.088(95%CI:0.065-0.110)] compared to biological (b) DMARDs[0.041(95%CI:0.031-0.051)], conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs[0.055(95%CI:0.043-0.067)], and anti-TNF therapy[0.029(95%CI:0.003-0.056)]. In contrast, those receiving anti-TNF therapy had the lowest prevalence. The overall hospitalization rate, ICU admission rate, and mortality of ARD patients due to COVID-19 were 0.402(95%CI:0.330-0.476), 0.077(95%CI:0.051-0.107), and 0.073(95%CI:0.046-0.104). Using bDMARDs had lower hospitalization rates[0.216(95%CI:0.147-0.286)], ICU admission rates[0.010(95%CI:0.000-0.037)], and mortality[0.039(95%CI:0.007-0.087)]. Regression analysis showed a significant negative relationship between bDMARDs monotherapy and ICU admission rates(regression coefficient:-0.156, 95%CI:-0.260 - -0.051, P=0.006). Patients using csDMARDs had higher hospitalization rates[0.607(95%CI:0.450-0.755)], ICU admission rates[0.055(95%CI:0.037-0.075)], and mortality[0.074(95%CI:0.041-0.114)]. Patients using GC had a higher hospitalization rate[0.703(95%CI:0.449-0.910)], higher ICU admission rate[0.094(95%CI:0.046-0.152)], and lower mortality[0.070(95%CI:0.033-0.114)]. Regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation between GC monotherapy and hospitalization(regression coefficient:0.484, 95%CI:0.146-0.822, P=0.006). For ARD patients, csDMARDs were associated with disease severity in COVID-19, bDMARDs were associated with a reduced risk of severe disease, and GC was effective in patients with severe COVID-19-related respiratory failure.