loading page

EARTH NETWORKS LIGHTNING NETWORK PERFORMANCE
  • +2
  • Richard Sonnenfeld,
  • Jeff Lapierre,
  • Luis Contreras Vidal,
  • Yanan Zhu,
  • Michael Stock
Richard Sonnenfeld
New Mexico Tech, Langmuir Laboratory

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jeff Lapierre
Earth Networks, Inc.
Author Profile
Luis Contreras Vidal
New Mexico Tech, Physics Department
Author Profile
Yanan Zhu
University of Alabama in Huntsville
Author Profile
Michael Stock
Earth Networks, Inc.
Author Profile

Abstract

The Earth Networks Total Lightning Network (ENTLN) is a global lighting detection network that has been operational since 2009. The ENTLN sensors are broadband electric field sensors that detect both intra-cloud (IC) and cloud-to-ground (CG) flashes and provide timing, location, classification, and peak current measurements. ENTLN consists of roughly 1600 wideband sensors deployed globally. Since its initial deployment, several improvements were made over the years to enhance its performance and usability. Notable ones are the addition of many new sensors each year to improve detection efficiency and extend global coverage. Firmware improvements have also been made to further increase sensitivity. A multi-parameter algorithm was incorporated to enhance IC and CG classification. To validate these improvements, Earth Networks has sponsored several studies to provide valuable feedback on performance improvements. This presentation will highlight two such studies. The first was performed at the Lightning Observatory in Gainesville (LOG), Florida using a combination of high-speed cameras and electric field sensors. For the 608 flashes in this study, a flash detection efficiency (DE) of 99% was found. Also, 97% of the flashes classified as CG by ENTLN algorithms were confirmed as CG via the measurements at LOG. The second study was performed at Langmuir Laboratory in New Mexico. In this study, 546 flashes were analyzed from three separate storms and ENTLN data was compared to simultaneously acquired interferometer (INTF) and electric field change array data (LEFA). Results show a total DE of 97.5%. Ninety one percent of flashes categorized at CG by EN were suggested to be CG by correlation of the LEFA+INTF data. Where EN determined the flash to be IC, LEFA+INTF agreed in 84% of cases.